Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | Radeon R9 M365X 4GB | GeForce GTX 670M 3GB |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 438% | 339% |
| Hitman 3 | 600% | 471% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 392% | 301% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 376% | 288% |
| FIFA 21 | 171% | 121% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 657% | 517% |
| Far Cry 6 | 679% | 535% |
| Genshin Impact | 438% | 339% |
| Battlefield 6 | 600% | 471% |
| Resident Evil 8 | 438% | 339% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670M 3GB are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.
The R9 M365X was released over three years more recently than the GTX 670M, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 670M when running the latest games.
The R9 M365X has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 670M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.
The GTX 670M has 8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M365X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 670M is marginally better than the R9 M365X.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 670M 3GB has 336. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 670M is 402. The GTX 670M having 62 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R9 M365X performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The R9 M365X transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 670M. This means that the R9 M365X is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 670M.
The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 670M 3GB requires 75 Watts. The GTX 670M requires 25 Watts more than the R9 M365X to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 670M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R9 M365X.
| Core Speed | 625 MHz |  | vs | 598 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 Venus PRO | Fermi GF114 | |||
| OC Potential | Good |
|
vs | Poor | |
| Driver Support | Great |
| vs | Poor | |
| Release Date | 09 Jun 2015 | | vs | 01 Mar 2012 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved | | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 7.7
|
vs | |
8.6
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 5.9
|
vs | |
6.6
|
|
| 1920x1080 | 4.5
|
vs | |
5.1
|
|
| 2560x1440 | 3
|
vs | |
3.1
|
|
| 3840x2160 | 2
|
|
vs | - | |
| Memory | 4096 MB | | vs | 3072 MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 1000 MHz | | vs | 750 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | 128 Bit | vs | | 192 Bit | |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | | vs | | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64GB/sec | vs | | 72GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | vs | |
512 KB | |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 640 | | vs | 336 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 16% | vs | | 19% | |
| Technology | 28nm | | vs | 40nm | |
| Texture Mapping Units | 40 | | vs | - | |
| Texture Rate | 25 GTexel/s | | vs | - | |
| Render Output Units | 16 | | vs | - | |
| Pixel Rate | 10 GPixel/s | | vs | - | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | | vs | 2560x1600 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 50 Watts | | vs | 75 Watts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 12.0 | | vs | | 12.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5.0 |
| Open GL | 4.4 | vs | | 4.5 | |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Dedicated | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz | | vs | Intel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 8 GB | vs | | 6 GB | |
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1600x900 | | vs | | 1600x900 |
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN). Architecture Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X. Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory. However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X. Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250. System Suggestions Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | GeForce GTX 670M 3GB is a high-end mobile GPU still based on the 2010 Fermi architecture. It's based on the Fermi GF114 Core which offers 336 Shader Processing Units, 56 TMUs and 24 ROPs on a 192-bit memory interface of 3GB GDDR5 (which is a gimmick since this GPU does not benefit from a 2GB frame buffer, let alone 3GB). The central clock runs at 598MHz and the memory clock operates at 750MHz. Expect a power consumption of up to 75 Watts. It's essentially a tweaked GeForce GTX 570M with a slightly higher clocked central unit that consumes the same power and so expect modern demanding games to be playable at 1080p with fluent frame rates (30+). | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||