Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 M365X 4GB GeForce GTX 670MX
Cyberpunk 2077 438% 296%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 392% 263%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 376% 251%
Grand Theft Auto VI 657% 458%
FIFA 21 171% 100%
Genshin Impact 438% 296%
Far Cry 6 679% 474%
Hitman 3 600% 416%
Watch Dogs Legion 419% 282%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 671% 468%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670MX are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R9 M365X 4GB.

The R9 M365X has a 24 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 670MX, but the GeForce GTX 670MX has 40 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 M365X. As a result, the GeForce GTX 670MX exhibits a 23.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the R9 M365X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 M365X has a 24 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce GTX 670MX, but the GeForce GTX 670MX has 8 more Render Output Units than the R9 M365X. As a result, the GeForce GTX 670MX exhibits a 4.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the R9 M365X. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 M365X was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 670MX, and so the R9 M365X is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 670MX.

The R9 M365X has 1024 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 670MX, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The GeForce GTX 670MX has 3.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 M365X, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 670MX is marginally better than the R9 M365X.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 670MX has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M365X is 340 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 670MX is 577. The GeForce GTX 670MX having 237 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 670MX delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 M365X.

The Radeon R9 M365X 4GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 670MX requires 75 Watts. The GeForce GTX 670MX requires 25 Watts more than the R9 M365X to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce GTX 670MX to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the R9 M365X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs601 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Venus PROKepler GK104-N13E-GR-A2
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date09 Jun 2015vs01 Oct 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.7
vs green tick
8.9
1600x900
5.9
vs green tick
6.8
1920x1080
4.5
vs green tick
5.3
2560x1440
3
vs green tick
3.3
3840x2160
2
vs green tick
2.2

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs700 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth64GB/secvs67.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB vs green tick 384 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs960
Actual Shader Performance16%vs28%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs80
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs48.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs24
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs14.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHzvsIntel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN).



Architecture
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus PRO which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X.
Venus PRO has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is Clocked at 625MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, because the GPU itself is too weak to work under other circumstances in which 4GB of Memory are needed - such as 4K Gaming, a Large Frame Buffer is mostly a Gimmick.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for large laptops.

Performance
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is a Direct Rebrand of Radeon R9 M265X.
Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 M365X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed Kepler GK104-N13E-GR-A2 which has 5 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 960 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 24 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 601MHz.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 3GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 192-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 700MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 75W, it is suited for large sized laptops.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks indicate is not too far from the desktop GeForce GTX 650 Ti.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Power Processor (Intel Core i7 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 670MX.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-