Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 910M 2GB Radeon HD 8610G
Cyberpunk 2077 1236% 1580%
Call of Duty Warzone 873% 1123%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1386% 1769%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1236% 1580%
Maneater 736% 951%
Valorant 5% 20%
Saints Row 3 Remastered 470% 617%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 836% 1077%
Doom Eternal 891% 1146%
Mafia 2: Definitive Edition 791% 1020%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 910M 2GB are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon HD 8610G.

The GeForce 910M 2GB has a 277 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD 8610G. This results in the GeForce 910M 2GB providing 13.1 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 910M 2GB has a 277 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon HD 8610G and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GeForce 910M 2GB providing 2.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 910M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the Radeon HD 8610G, and so the GeForce 910M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon HD 8610G.

The GeForce 910M 2GB has 2048 MB video memory, but the Radeon HD 8610G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the GeForce 910M 2GB and the Radeon HD 8610G have 384 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce 910M 2GB is 311 and by the Radeon HD 8610G is 240. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce 910M 2GB is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The GeForce 910M 2GB transistor size technology is 4 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 8610G. This means that the GeForce 910M 2GB is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 8610G.

The GeForce 910M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 8610G requires 25 Watts. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed810 MHzvs533 MHz
Boost Clock-vs626 MHz
ArchitectureKepler GK107?Terascale 3
OC Potential None vs None
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date27 Jul 2015vs23 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - green tick vs green tick -
green tick vs
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed900 MHzvs667 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs21.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs384
Actual Shader Performance15%vs12%
Texture Mapping Units32vs24
Texture Rate25.9 GTexel/svs12.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate6.5 GPixel/svs4.3 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewProduct Information not Known as of July/2015.Radeon HD 8610G is an integrated mobile GPU, first seen on the ultra low-voltage APU A10-5745M, based on the 32nm, Terascale 3 architecture.
It offer 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a DDR3 memory interface of either a 128-bit bus width, if the laptop system RAM's is dual-channelled, or a 64-bit bus width, if not. The central units runs at 533MHz and goes up to 626MHz, in Turbo Mode. The memory clock can operate up to 667MHz, as the max memory supported by the CPU is DDR3-1333.
Its performance depends heavily on whether or not the memory is dual-channelled. Benchmarks put its performance on level with today's middle-class GPUs such as GeForce GT 540M-GeForce GT 630M or Radeon HD 7650M/7670M. Therefore, modern demanding games can be played with medium detail.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants