In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 42 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 8610G, but the HD 8610G has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. As a result, the HD 8610G exhibits a 7.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 42 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 8610G, but the HD 8610G has 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. As a result, the HD 8610G exhibits a 3.9 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce 920M 2GB. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the HD 8610G, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 8610G.

The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual and the GeForce 920M 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The HD 8610G has 6.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the HD 8610G is marginally better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual has 768 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 920M 2GB has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 8610G is 240 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 126 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the HD 8610G performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce 920M 2GB transistor size technology is 4 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 8610G. This means that the GeForce 920M 2GB is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 8610G. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce 920M 2GB should consume less power than the HD 8610G.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run but there is no entry for the HD 8610G.