Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual GeForce 920M 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 707% 737%
Hitman 3 950% 989%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 638% 666%
Resident Evil 8 707% 737%
FIFA 21 307% 322%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1036% 1078%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 614% 641%
The Medium 907% 944%
Genshin Impact 707% 737%
Far Cry 6 1068% 1111%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 42 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 8610G, but the HD 8610G has 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. As a result, the HD 8610G exhibits a 7.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 42 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 8610G, but the HD 8610G has 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. As a result, the HD 8610G exhibits a 3.9 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce 920M 2GB. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the HD 8610G, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 8610G.

The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual and the GeForce 920M 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The HD 8610G has 6.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the HD 8610G is marginally better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual has 768 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 920M 2GB has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 8610G is 240 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 126 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the HD 8610G performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce 920M 2GB transistor size technology is 4 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 8610G. This means that the GeForce 920M 2GB is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 8610G. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce 920M 2GB should consume less power than the HD 8610G.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run but there is no entry for the HD 8610G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed533 MHzvs575 MHz
Boost Clock626 MHzvs954 MHz
ArchitectureTerascale 3 Devastator (x2)Kepler GK208-N16V-GM
OC Potential None vs Poor
Driver Support Poor vs Good
Release Date23 May 2013vs13 Mar 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
green tick vs green tick
6.4
1600x900
4.9
green tick vs green tick
4.9
1920x1080
3.4
green tick vs
3.3
2560x1440
2.3
green tick vs green tick
2.3
3840x2160 - vs green tick
1.5

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs14.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 4352 KB green tick vs 128 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs384
Actual Shader Performance12%vs18%
Technology32nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units48vs32
Texture Rate25.6 GTexel/svs18.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs8
Pixel Rate8.5 GPixel/svs4.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.3vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD APU A10-5745M Quad-CorevsIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewCombination of Radeon HD 8610G with Radeon HD 8670M, using AMD's Asymmetric Crossfire Technology. Overview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-