Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Red Dead Redemption 2 664% 98%
Cyberpunk 2077 950% 172%
Doom Eternal 557% 70%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 371% 22%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 664% 98%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 950% 172%
FIFA 20 307% 6%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1068% 203%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 950% 172%
Need For Speed Heat 664% 98%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M SLI are massively better than the AMD Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual.

The GTX 675M has a 87 MHz higher core clock speed and 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 8610G. This results in the GTX 675M providing 53.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 675M has a 87 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Render Output Units than the HD 8610G. This results in the GTX 675M providing 31.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The HD 8610G was released over a year more recently than the GTX 675M, and so the HD 8610G is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 675M.

The GTX 675M has 2048 MB more video memory than the HD 8610G, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 675M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 675M has 170.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 8610G, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 675M is massively better than the HD 8610G.

Both the Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8670M Dual and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI have 768 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GTX 675M is 952 and by the HD 8610G is 952. Knowing that the shader performance of the GTX 675M is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The HD 8610G transistor size technology is 8 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 675M. This means that the HD 8610G is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 675M.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI requires 200 Watts to run but there is no entry for the HD 8610G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed533 MHzvs620 MHz
Boost Clock626 MHzvs-
ArchitectureTerascale 3 Devastator (x2)Fermi GF114 (x2)
OC Potential None vs None
Driver Support Poor vs -
Release Date23 May 2013vs22 Mar 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed667 MHzvs750 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth21.3GB/secvs192GB/sec
L2 Cache 4352 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs768
Actual Shader Performance12%vs46%
Texture Mapping Units48vs128
Texture Rate25.6 GTexel/svs79.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs64
Pixel Rate8.5 GPixel/svs39.7 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-200 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.3vs4.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorAMD APU A10-5745M Quad-CorevsIntel Core i7-3610QM 4-Core 2.3GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewCombination of Radeon HD 8610G with Radeon HD 8670M, using AMD's Asymmetric Crossfire Technology. GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 675M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 675M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, about 35% better than a single GeForce GTX 675M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 675M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants