Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition GeForce GTX 670 Gigabyte 3xWindForce Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 194% 66%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 171% 53%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 201% 70%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 325% 140%
eFootball PES 2021 49% 16%
Genshin Impact 196% 67%
FIFA 21 49% 16%
Death Stranding 196% 67%
Watch Dogs Legion 186% 61%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 162% 48%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 Gigabyte 3xWindForce Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition.

The GTX 670 has a 55 MHz higher core clock speed and 56 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 560. This results in the GTX 670 providing 58 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 670 has a 55 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 560 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 670 providing 1.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 670 was released less than a year after the GTX 560, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GTX 670 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 560, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 670 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 670 has 57.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 560, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 670 is much better than the GTX 560.

The GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition has 336 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 670 Gigabyte 3xWindForce Edition has 1344. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 560 is 622 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 670 is 1422. The GTX 670 having 800 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 670 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 560.

The GTX 670 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 560. This means that the GTX 670 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 560.

The GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition requires 150 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 670 Gigabyte 3xWindForce Edition requires 180 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 560 and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GTX 670. The GTX 670 requires 30 Watts more than the GTX 560 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 670 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 560.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed925 MHzvs980 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1058 MHz
ArchitectureFermi GF114-325-A1Kepler GK104-325-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Good
Release Date19 May 2011vs01 May 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
7.9
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
6.1
vs green tick
8.3
2560x1440
4.1
vs green tick
6
3840x2160 - vs green tick
4.4

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1050 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth134.4GB/secvs192.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units336vs1344
Actual Shader Performance30%vs68%
Technology40nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units56vs112
Texture Rate51.8 GTexel/svs109.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs32
Pixel Rate29.6 GPixel/svs31.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power150 Wattsvs180 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 30 Ampsvs550 Watts & 46 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-2300 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 560 Asus DirectCU II TOP 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of NVIDIA's Performance GeForce GTX 560, created by Asus.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit now runs at 925MHz, instead of 810MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock is now of 1050MHz, instead of 1002MHz.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.


Cooling Solution
DirectCU II: Copper heat pipes in direct contact with the GPU to speed up heat dissipation for over 20% cooler performance, DirectCU II takes cooling further with twin 80mm fans for doubled airflow.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 9% Performance Boost over the Reference GeForce GTX 560.
GeForce GTX 670 Gigabyte 3xWindForce Edition is a Special Edition of the powerful GeForce GTX 670. See the standard version for more information about it.
The new features include overclocking out of the box in the core-clock that went from 915MHz to 980MHz while the Turbo Boost can now reach 1058MHz. A new cooling system using the "Triangle Cool" Technology is also featured.
The performance boost is significant and around 5% when compared to the reference GeForce GTX 670 and so even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings and with attractive resolutions.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-