Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Mobility Radeon HD 3670 Quadro FX 1600M
Red Dead Redemption 2 2992% 1954%
Cyberpunk 2077 4149% 2721%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1808% 1167%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 4149% 2721%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2992% 1954%
Doom Eternal 2559% 1666%
FIFA 20 1547% 994%
Grand Theft Auto VI 4625% 3038%
Need For Speed Heat 2992% 1954%
Halo: Reach 883% 553%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M are significantly better than the AMD Mobility Radeon HD 3670.

The Radeon HD was released less than a year after the Quadro FX 1600M, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and the Quadro FX 1600M have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The memory bandwidth of the Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and the Quadro FX 1600M are the same, which means the Radeon HD and the Quadro FX 1600M have equal limitations when it comes to graphical data transfer.

The Radeon HD has 120 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Mobility Radeon HD 3670 requires 30 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts. The Quadro FX 1600M requires 20 Watts more than the Radeon HD to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 1600M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon HD.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed680 MHzvs625 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRV635G84M
OC Potential Fair vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date07 Jan 2008vs01 Jun 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory512 MBvs512 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs25.6GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units120vs-
Actual Shader Performance4%vs-
Technology-vs80nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections-vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power30 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10.1vs10
Shader Model4.1vs4.0
Open GL2.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3000 Series of discrete graphics allow you to experience the power of HD with graphics processing designed for how you work and play. Advance to the next generation of HD game performance and lifelike realism thanks to Microsoft DirectX 10.1 capabilities and PCI Express 2.0 support for fast throughput and superior overall system performance. Watch the latest Blu-ray and HD-DVD videos in full-HD 1080p image resolution off your graphics processor and reduce demands on your CPU. Enjoy breakthrough energy efficiency with superb performance-per-watt delivering exceptional battery life.The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body