0
Check Prices $109.00
0
Check Prices $149.00
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R7 360 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Cyberpunk 2077 229% 180%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 204% 158%
Genshin Impact 232% 183%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 238% 188%
eFootball PES 2021 68% 43%
FIFA 21 68% 43%
Marvel's Avengers 215% 168%
Watch Dogs Legion 221% 173%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 376% 305%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 194% 150%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon R7 360.

The Radeon R7 360 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750 Ti. This results in the Radeon R7 360 providing 9.6 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 360 has a 30 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 750 Ti and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon R7 360 providing 0.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R7 360 was released over a year more recently than the GTX 750 Ti, and so the Radeon R7 360 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 750 Ti.

The Radeon R7 360 and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon R7 360 has 9.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R7 360 is marginally better than the GTX 750 Ti.

The Radeon R7 360 has 768 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 360 is 685 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 Ti is 937. The GTX 750 Ti having 252 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon R7 360 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The Radeon R7 360 requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti requires 60 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the Radeon R7 360 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750 Ti. The Radeon R7 360 requires 15 Watts more than the GTX 750 Ti to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon R7 360 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 750 Ti.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1050 MHzvs1020 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1085 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Tobago PROMaxwell GM107-400-A2
OC Potential Fair vs Good
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date18 Jun 2015vs18 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9.8
vs green tick
10
1600x900
7.6
vs green tick
8.1
1920x1080
5.8
vs green tick
6.3
2560x1440
4.1
vs green tick
4.5
3840x2160
2.5
vs green tick
2.8

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1500 MHzvs1350 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth96GB/secvs86.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs640
Actual Shader Performance33%vs45%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units48vs40
Texture Rate50.4 GTexel/svs40.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate16.8 GPixel/svs16.3 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections1vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power75 Wattsvs60 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 30 Ampsvs300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4370 3.8GHzvsIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R7 360 is a Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
Radeon R7 360 Equips a GPU Codenamed Tobago PRO which is a Second Gen GCN GPU and can be considered a rename of the Bonaire PRO previously used on Radeon R7 260.
Tobago PRO has 12 Compute Units activated and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is clocked at 1050MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with fast GDDR5 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1500Hz.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB. This would be useful were the Graphics Card suited for 1080p Gaming, which is not the case. Power Consumption

With a rated board TDP of 75W, it requires at least a 500W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
Radeon R7 360 2GB is essentially a faster Radeon R7 260 2GB.
Its release Price of $109 is what makes it a very competitive Graphics Card because its performance is only slightly better than GeForce GTX 750 and the GPU is not 1080p gaming capable, considering today's gaming market.

System Suggestions
Radeon R7 360 2GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1600x900. We recommend a Decent Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Overview
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a performance Graphics Card based on the first variant of the Maxwell architecture.

Architecture
The first variant of the Maxwell Architecture succeeds the Kepler Architecture. Despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, it has an extremely large L2 Cache which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed GM107-400-A2 which has 5 SM activated and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 1020MHz and goes up to 1085MHz, in Turbo Mode, while the memory clock operates at 1350MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.2 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for GameStream, G-SYNC, GPU Boost 2.0, GeForce Experience, PhysX and other technologies.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling Solution consists of a Single-Fan and is identical to the one seen on GeForce GTX 650. The Card is known to run very cool and has a maximum operating temperature of 95ÂșC.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 60W, it requires at least a 300W PSU and relies entirely on the PCI Slot for power.

Release Price
Pricing is identical to the one seen on its predecessors - $149.

Performance
Benchmarks indicate its performance is largely better than its predecessor's but Radeon HD 7850 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost Edition still offer better performance, due to their high memory bandwidth transfer rates.

System Suggestions
We recommend a strong processor (Intel Core i5 Quad Core/AMD FX Six Core) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants