8.8
Check Prices $649.00
3.5
Check Prices $399.00
Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB GeForce GTX 770
Red Dead Redemption 2 13% 45%
Cyberpunk 2077 19% 99%
Doom Eternal 25% 24%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 13% 45%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 46% 11%
Halo: Reach 72% 54%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 19% 99%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 19% 99%
Grand Theft Auto VI 33% 121%
Need For Speed Heat 13% 45%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770.

The R9 FURY has a 4 MHz higher core clock speed and 128 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce GTX 770. This results in the R9 FURY providing 134.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 FURY has a 4 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Render Output Units than the GeForce GTX 770. This results in the R9 FURY providing 33.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 FURY was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 770, and so the R9 FURY is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 770.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The R9 FURY has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 770, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the R9 FURY also has superior memory performance overall.

The R9 FURY has 287.7 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce GTX 770, which means that the memory performance of the R9 FURY is massively better than the GeForce GTX 770.

The Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB has 4096 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 770 has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 FURY is 3656 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 770 is 1667. The R9 FURY having 1989 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 FURY delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce GTX 770.

The Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB requires 275 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 770 requires 230 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the R9 FURY and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 770. The R9 FURY requires 45 Watts more than the GeForce GTX 770 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 FURY may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce GTX 770.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1050 MHzvs1046 MHz
Boost Clock-vs1085 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 Fiji XTKepler GK104-425-A2
OC Potential Poor vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date24 Jun 2015vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1600x900
10
green tick vs green tick
10
1920x1080
10
green tick vs
8.6
2560x1440
8.4
green tick vs
6.3
3840x2160
6.5
green tick vs
4.6

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed500 MHzvs1752 MHz
Memory Bus4096 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeHBM-1vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth512GB/secvs224.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression yes vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units4096vs1536
Actual Shader Performance100%vs80%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units256vs128
Texture Rate268.8 GTexel/svs133.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs32
Pixel Rate67.2 GPixel/svs33.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections4vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power275 Wattsvs230 Watts
Recommended PSU600 Watts & 42 Ampsvs550 Watts & 37 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4790K 4-Core 4.0GHzvsIntel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM16 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution2560x1600vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB is an Enthusiast Graphics Card based on the Third Revision of the Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture.

Architecture
The Fiji is a Second Generation GCN GPU. It offers support for HBM-1 Memory, DirectX 12.0, Open GL 4.5 and the acclaimed Delta Compression Algorithm which may decrease bandwidth consumption by up to 30%, in most games.
Fiji XT is the Full Variant of the GPU with 64 Compute Units activated, offering 4096 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 64 ROPs.

GPU
The Central Unit is clocked at 1000MHz.

Memory: Speed
The GPU is equipped with stacked HBM-1 Memory and accesses the Frame Buffer through a 4096-bit memory interface.

Memory: Frame Buffer
The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 4GB. Under most circumstances, this only proves useful in certain 3D Games whose Settings Require Large Amounts of Memory.
However, and because the GPU itself is aimed for 4K Gaming, 4GB might be a bottlenecked and Performance could be better, were the Frame Buffer larger.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 275W, it requires at least a 600W PSU with two available 8-pin connectors.

Performance
Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB competes with GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB and both are available for $649.
Benchmarks However Indicate that GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB is still faster than Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB, even at 4K, whereas as the resolution goes down, the performance gap between the latter and GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB increases and at 1600x900, Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB is only as fast as the weaker GeForce GTX 980.
Considering Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB offers practically no overclock potential (operating memory clock can't even be increased), consumes slightly more energy than GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB, costs the same price and performs worse, Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB ends up being one of AMD's worst releases of the last years and given the hype built, probably the most disappointing.

System Suggestions
Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560x1600. We recommend a Very Strong Processor and 16GB of RAM for Optimal Performance.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-

Title

Body