Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 960 Ti 4GB FirePro S9150
Cyberpunk 2077 41% 62%
Hitman 3 84% 111%
Resident Evil 8 41% 62%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 29% 48%
FIFA 21 29% 18%
Grand Theft Auto VI 99% 128%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 25% 44%
Genshin Impact 41% 62%
Far Cry 6 104% 135%
The Medium 76% 103%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 Ti 4GB are very slightly better than the AMD FirePro S9150.

The GTX 960 Ti has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9150, but the FirePro S9150 has 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 960 Ti. As a result, the FirePro S9150 exhibits a 57.6 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 960 Ti. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 960 Ti has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9150 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 960 Ti providing 9.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 960 Ti was released over a year more recently than the FirePro S9150, and so the GTX 960 Ti is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the FirePro S9150.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The FirePro S9150 has 12288 MB more video memory than the GTX 960 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9150 also has superior memory performance overall.

The FirePro S9150 has 95.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 960 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9150 is massively better than the GTX 960 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 960 Ti 4GB has 1536 Shader Processing Units and the FirePro S9150 has 2816. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 960 Ti is 1809 and the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9150 is 2534. The FirePro S9150 having 725 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro S9150 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 960 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 960 Ti 4GB requires 140 Watts to run and the FirePro S9150 requires 235 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the GTX 960 Ti. The FirePro S9150 requires 95 Watts more than the GTX 960 Ti to run. The difference is significant enough that the FirePro S9150 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 960 Ti.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1050 MHzvs900 MHz
Boost Clock1178 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM204-200-KDGCN 2.0 Hawaii XT GL
OC Potential Fair vs Good
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date31 Oct 2015vs01 Aug 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - green tick vs green tick -
1920x1080
8.9
green tick vs -
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs16384 MB
Memory Speed1753 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth224.4GB/secvs320GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units1536vs2816
Actual Shader Performance87%vs100%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units96vs176
Texture Rate100.8 GTexel/svs158.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units64vs64
Pixel Rate67.2 GPixel/svs57.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power140 Wattsvs235 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 33 Amps-

GPU Features

DirectX12vs11.2
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4690K 3.5GHzvsIntel Xeon E7-8890 v2
Recommended RAM8 GBvs16 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs5760x1600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 960 Ti 4GB is an upcoming high-end Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Maxwell architecture.

Architecture
The first variant of the Maxwell Architecture succeeds the Kepler Architecture. Despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, it has an extremely large L2 Cache which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed GM204-200-KD which has 12 SM activated and thus offers 1536 Shader Processing Units, 96 TMUs and 64 ROPs. The central unit runs at ????MHz and goes up to ????MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 4GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 256-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1753MHz.

Features
DirectX 12.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, GameStream, G-SYNC, GPU Boost 2.0, GeForce Experience, PhysX and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 140W, it requires at least a 450W PSU with one available 6-pin connector.

Performance
Coming Soon!

System Suggestions
We recommend a very strong processor (Intel Core i5 Quad Core/AMD FX Eight Core) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GTX 960 Ti 2GB.
FirePro S9150 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture.

It's based on the Hawaii XT Core (same used on Radeon R9 290X) and therefore offers 2816 Shader Processing Units, 176 TMUs and 64 ROPs on a 512-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1250MHZ.

Compared to Radeon R9 290X, its central unit is slightly lower and overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon R9 290X because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9150 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 10% and 15% worse than Radeon R9 290X.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-