Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GFX 2560x1440 Intel 865G
Cyberpunk 2077 0% 19725%
Hitman 3 0% 25689%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 0% 18032%
The Medium 0% 24637%
Resident Evil 8 0% 19725%
FIFA 21 0% 9900%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 0% 17444%
Grand Theft Auto VI 0% 27795%
Genshin Impact 0% 19725%
Far Cry 6 0% 28584%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel 865G are massively better than the Intel GFX 2560x1440.

The GFX 2560x1440 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The 865G was released over three years more recently than the GFX 2560x1440, and so the 865G is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GFX 2560x1440 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 865G has 16 MB video memory, but the GFX 2560x1440 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the GFX 2560x1440 and the 865G have 0 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The 865G requires 13 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GFX 2560x1440.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs200 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-Springdale
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date30 Nov -0001vs01 May 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - green tick vs green tick -
1920x1080 - green tick vs green tick -
2560x1440
10
green tick vs -
3840x2160 - green tick vs green tick -

GPU Memory

Memory-vsN/A
Memory Speed-vs-
Memory Bus-vs64 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs-
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs1280x1024
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-13 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX-vs7.0
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL-vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewTOP GPU for 2560x1440Intel 865G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Pentium D, Pentium Extreme Edition, Celeron, Celeron D CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics 2.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 so even DirectX 8/9 games aren't (hardware) supported. The performance is ridiculous and even very old games (before 2003) might require reduced settings. Today's games are, obviously, unplayable.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-