Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GFX 3840x2160 Riva TNT2 Pro
Red Dead Redemption 2 0% 27336%
Cyberpunk 2077 0% 37592%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 0% 16823%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 0% 37592%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0% 27336%
Doom Eternal 0% 23490%
FIFA 20 0% 14515%
Grand Theft Auto VI 0% 41823%
Need For Speed Heat 0% 27336%
Halo: Reach 0% 8618%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro are massively better than the Intel GFX 3840x2160.

The GFX 3840x2160 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The Riva TNT2 Pro was released over three years more recently than the GFX 3840x2160, and so the Riva TNT2 Pro is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GFX 3840x2160 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 32 MB video memory, but the GFX 3840x2160 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GFX 3840x2160 has 0 Shader Processing Units and the Riva TNT2 Pro has 2. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs143 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-NV5
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date30 Nov -0001vs12 Oct 1999
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900 - green tick vs green tick -
1920x1080 - green tick vs green tick -
2560x1440 - green tick vs green tick -
3840x2160
10
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory-vs32 MB
Memory Speed-vs166 MHz
Memory Bus-vs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs2.7GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology-vs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)-vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX-vs6.0
Shader Model-vs-
Open GL-vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewTOP GPU for 3840x2160The RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body