Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro FX 1600M GeForce 9400M G
Halo: Reach 553% 797%
Cyberpunk 2077 2721% 3779%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1954% 2723%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1167% 1641%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1954% 2723%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2721% 3779%
Doom Eternal 1666% 2327%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3038% 4214%
FIFA 20 994% 1404%
Need For Speed Heat 1954% 2723%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 9400M G.

The GeForce 9400M G was released over a year more recently than the Quadro FX 1600M, and so the GeForce 9400M G is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro FX 1600M.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 512 MB video memory, but the GeForce 9400M G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 9400M G has 16 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce 9400M G requires 12 Watts. The Quadro FX 1600M requires 38 Watts more than the GeForce 9400M G to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro FX 1600M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce 9400M G.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG84MMCP79MX
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jun 2007vs01 Oct 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory512 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed800 MHzvs-
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vs-
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs-
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs16
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology80nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs12 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs10
Shader Model4.0vs4.0
Open GL2.1vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G motherboard GPU redefines the notebook architecture by combining a mainstream GPU, system memory controller, and system I/O into a single chip for the smallest, most power efficient visual computing experience ever available in notebooks.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body