Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro FX 1600M Mobility Radeon X1900
Red Dead Redemption 2 1954% 3010%
Halo: Reach 553% 888%
Cyberpunk 2077 2721% 4173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1954% 3010%
Doom Eternal 1666% 2574%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2721% 4173%
Grand Theft Auto VI 3038% 4653%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 1167% 1819%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 2721% 4173%
Need For Speed Heat 1954% 3010%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1600M are significantly better than the AMD Mobility Radeon X1900.

The Quadro FX 1600M was released less than a year after the Mobility Radeon X1900, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 1600M has 256 MB more video memory than the Mobility Radeon X1900, so is likely to be slightly better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, the overall memory performance is about the same.

The Mobility Radeon X1900 has 4.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Quadro FX 1600M, which means that the memory performance of the Mobility Radeon X1900 is marginally better than the Quadro FX 1600M.

The Mobility Radeon X1900 has 8 Shader Processing Units but the Quadro FX 1600M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Quadro FX 1600M requires 50 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Mobility Radeon X1900.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG84MRV570
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Jun 2007vs11 Jan 2007
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory512 MBvs256 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs470 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs30.1GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs8
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology80nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2048x1536
VGA Connections-vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections-vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Watts-
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs9.0c
Shader Model4.0vs3.0
Open GL2.1vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.Mobility Radeon? X1900 delivers exceptional 3D graphics performance, top video playback quality, and vibrant image quality for performance notebook PCs. A potent ultra-threaded 3D architecture with advanced power management pumps visual velocity into high-definition video and display enhancements for the finest in mobile entertainment.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body