Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game HD i7 3770S Quadro FX 5500
Cyberpunk 2077 2252% 2314%
Call of Duty Warzone 1612% 1657%
Grand Theft Auto VI 2516% 2585%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 2252% 2314%
Minecraft: Dungeons 1708% 1756%
Maneater 1372% 1411%
Valorant 68% 72%
Saints Row 3 Remastered 903% 930%
Doom Eternal 1644% 1690%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 1548% 1591%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD i7 3770S are marginally better than the Nvidia Quadro FX 5500.

The HD i7 3770S was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 5500, and so the HD i7 3770S is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 5500 when running the latest games.

The Quadro FX 5500 has 1024 MB video memory, but the HD i7 3770S does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The HD i7 3770S has 16 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro FX 5500 has 8. However, the actual shader performance of the HD i7 3770S is 74 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 5500 is 6. The HD i7 3770S having 68 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Quadro FX 5500 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The HD i7 3770S requires 77 Watts to run and the Quadro FX 5500 requires 96 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the HD i7 3770S and a PSU with at least 350 Watts for the Quadro FX 5500. The Quadro FX 5500 requires 19 Watts more than the HD i7 3770S to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Quadro FX 5500 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the HD i7 3770S.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed650 MHzvs700 MHz
Boost Clock1150 MHzvs-
ArchitectureIvy Bridge GT2G71GL
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date29 Apr 2012vs20 Apr 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
2.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
2.1
green tick vs -
2560x1440
1.5
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs1024 MB
Memory Speed800 MHzvs575 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth25.6GB/secvs36.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 1024 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units16vs8
Actual Shader Performance4%vs0%
Technology22nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units4vs-
Texture Rate2.6 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate2.6 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs-
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power77 Wattsvs96 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 22 Ampsvs350 Watts

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs9.0c
Shader Model5.0vs3.0
Open GL4.0vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1024x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Intel HD i7 3770S is the specific version of Intel HD Graphics 4000 Desktop that is Integrated in the Core i7-3770S Processor.

GPU
The Central Unit Initially Runs at 650MHz and goes up to 1150MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
Frame Buffer: Up to 1.7GB.

Memory Channel: 64-bit Or 128-bit.

Memory Clock: Up to 800MHz.

Memory Bandwidth: It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Performance
Gaming Benchmarks Indicate its Performance is Similar to of a Dedicated GeForce GT 620.

System Suggestions
We recommend 4GB of RAM for a system with Intel HD i7 3770S.
The Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-