Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress 1150 Intel 865G
Cyberpunk 2077 22500% 19725%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 20570% 18032%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 19900% 17444%
Hitman 3 29300% 25689%
Grand Theft Auto VI 31700% 27795%
FIFA 21 11300% 9900%
Far Cry 6 32600% 28584%
Genshin Impact 22500% 19725%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 32300% 28321%
Watch Dogs Legion 21700% 19023%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel 865G are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1150.

The Radeon Xpress 1150 was released over three years more recently than the 865G, and so the Radeon Xpress 1150 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 865G when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The 865G has 16 MB video memory, but the Radeon Xpress 1150 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon Xpress 1150 has 2 Shader Processing Units and the 865G has 0. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The 865G requires 13 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon Xpress 1150.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs200 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS482Springdale
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support Discontinued vs -
Release Date01 Jun 2006vs01 May 2003
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
1.3
green tick vs -
1600x900
0.8
green tick vs -
1920x1080 - green tick vs green tick -
2560x1440
0.1
green tick vs -
3840x2160
0.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/AvsN/A
Memory Speed400 MHzvs-
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs-
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs-
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology110nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units2vs-
Texture Rate0.8 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units2vs-
Pixel Rate0.8 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs1280x1024
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-13 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0vs7.0
Shader Model3.0vs-
Open GL2.0vs1.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron D 310-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution800x600-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewVery Old Discontinued Graphics Card. Even Windows can be considered unplayable.Intel 865G comes embedded on the Pentium 4, Pentium D, Pentium Extreme Edition, Celeron, Celeron D CPUS and features an Integrated GPU called Intel Extreme Graphics 2.
It only supports DirectX up to 7.0 so even DirectX 8/9 games aren't (hardware) supported. The performance is ridiculous and even very old games (before 2003) might require reduced settings. Today's games are, obviously, unplayable.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-