Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress 1150 Radeon 9250
Cyberpunk 2077 29300% 13143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21300% 9540%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 13100% 5846%
Halo: Reach 6700% 2963%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 29300% 13143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21300% 9540%
FIFA 20 11300% 5035%
Doom Eternal 18300% 8188%
Grand Theft Auto VI 32600% 14630%
Need For Speed Heat 21300% 9540%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon 9250 are massively better than the AMD Radeon Xpress 1150.

The Radeon Xpress 1150 was released over a year more recently than the Radeon 9250, and so the Radeon Xpress 1150 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon 9250.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon 9250 has 128 MB video memory, but the Radeon Xpress 1150 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon Xpress 1150 has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon 9250 has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon Xpress 1150 is 0 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon 9250 is 1. The Radeon 9250 having 1 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon Xpress 1150 performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs240 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS482RV280
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support Discontinued vs -
Release Date01 Jun 2006vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
1.3
green tick vs -
1600x900
0.8
green tick vs -
1920x1080 - green tick vs green tick -
2560x1440
0.1
green tick vs -
3840x2160
0.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs128 MB
Memory Speed400 MHzvs200 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology110nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units2vs-
Texture Rate0.8 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units2vs-
Pixel Rate0.8 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0vs8.1
Shader Model3.0vs1.4
Open GL2.0vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron D 310-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution800x600-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewVery Old Discontinued Graphics Card. Even Windows can be considered unplayable.The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body