Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon Xpress 1150 | GeForce 6150 LE |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 22500% | 22961% |
Hitman 3 | 29300% | 29900% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 20570% | 20992% |
Resident Evil 8 | 22500% | 22961% |
FIFA 21 | 11300% | 11533% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 31700% | 32349% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 19900% | 20308% |
The Medium | 28100% | 28676% |
Genshin Impact | 22500% | 22961% |
Far Cry 6 | 32600% | 33267% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon Xpress 1150 are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 6150 LE.
The GeForce 6150 LE has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon Xpress 1150, but the Radeon Xpress 1150 has 1 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 6150 LE. As a result, the Radeon Xpress 1150 exhibits a 0.4 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GeForce 6150 LE. Neither of these GPUs support DirectX 10 or higher, so Texture Rate holds more weight than when comparing more modern GPUs.
The GeForce 6150 LE has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon Xpress 1150, but the Radeon Xpress 1150 has 1 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 6150 LE. As a result, the Radeon Xpress 1150 exhibits a 0.4 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GeForce 6150 LE. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The Radeon Xpress 1150 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce 6150 LE, and so the Radeon Xpress 1150 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce 6150 LE.
Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.
The Radeon Xpress 1150 and the GeForce 6150 LE have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The Radeon Xpress 1150 has 3.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 6150 LE, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon Xpress 1150 is marginally better than the GeForce 6150 LE.
Both the Radeon Xpress 1150 and the GeForce 6150 LE have 2 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce 6150 LE is 1 and by the Radeon Xpress 1150 is 1. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce 6150 LE is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.
The GeForce 6150 LE transistor size technology is 20 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon Xpress 1150. This means that the GeForce 6150 LE is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon Xpress 1150. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce 6150 LE should consume less power than the Radeon Xpress 1150.
Core Speed | 400 MHz | vs | ![]() | 425 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | RS482 | C51 | |||
OC Potential | None |
![]() |
vs | - | |
Driver Support | Discontinued | vs | - | ||
Release Date | 01 Jun 2006 | ![]() | vs | 11 Oct 2004 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 1.3
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 0.8
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
2560x1440 | 0.1
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 0.1
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | N/A | vs | N/A | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 400 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Memory Bus | 64 Bit | vs | ![]() | 128 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR | ![]() | vs | - | |
Memory Bandwidth | 3.2GB/sec | ![]() | vs | - | |
L2 Cache | 0 KB | ![]() |
vs | - | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | - | vs | ![]() | 0% | |
Technology | 110nm | vs | ![]() | 90nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 2 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
Texture Rate | 0.8 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 0.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 2 | ![]() | vs | 1 | |
Pixel Rate | 0.8 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 0.4 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2048x1536 | vs | ![]() | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | - | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 9.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 9.0c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 3.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 3.0 |
Open GL | 2.0 | vs | ![]() | 2.1 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
Dedicated | no | vs | no | ||
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Celeron D 310 | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 2 GB | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 800x600 | ![]() | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Very Old Discontinued Graphics Card. Even Windows can be considered unplayable. | Weak integrated graphics. None of today's modern games will run smoothly. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |