Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon Xpress 1150 Riva TNT2 Pro
Halo: Reach 6700% 8618%
Cyberpunk 2077 29300% 37592%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 13100% 16823%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21300% 27336%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21300% 27336%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 29300% 37592%
Doom Eternal 18300% 23490%
Grand Theft Auto VI 32600% 41823%
FIFA 20 11300% 14515%
Need For Speed Heat 21300% 27336%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon Xpress 1150 are noticeably better than the Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro.

The Radeon Xpress 1150 was released over three years more recently than the Riva TNT2 Pro, and so the Radeon Xpress 1150 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Riva TNT2 Pro when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Riva TNT2 Pro has 32 MB video memory, but the Radeon Xpress 1150 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Both the Radeon Xpress 1150 and the Riva TNT2 Pro have 2 Shader Processing Units. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed400 MHzvs143 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureRS482NV5
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support Discontinued vs -
Release Date01 Jun 2006vs12 Oct 1999
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
1.3
green tick vs -
1600x900
0.8
green tick vs -
1920x1080 - green tick vs green tick -
2560x1440
0.1
green tick vs -
3840x2160
0.1
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

MemoryN/Avs32 MB
Memory Speed400 MHzvs166 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR
Memory Bandwidth3.2GB/secvs2.7GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB green tick vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs2
Actual Shader Performance-vs-
Technology110nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units2vs-
Texture Rate0.8 GTexel/svs-
Render Output Units2vs-
Pixel Rate0.8 GPixel/svs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2048x1536vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9.0vs6.0
Shader Model3.0vs-
Open GL2.0vs1.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatednovsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Celeron D 310-
Recommended RAM2 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution800x600-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewVery Old Discontinued Graphics Card. Even Windows can be considered unplayable.The RIVA TNT2 was a graphics processing unit manufactured by Nvidia starting in early 1999. The chip is codenamed "NV5" because it is the 5th graphics chip design by Nvidia, succeeding the RIVA TNT (NV4). RIVA is an acronym for Real-time Interactive Video and Animation accelerator. The "TNT" suffix refers to the chip's ability to work on two texels at once (TwiN Texel). Nvidia removed RIVA from the name later in the chip's lifetime.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body