Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro FX 1400 Radeon X1050
Cyberpunk 2077 3783% 7640%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 3452% 6979%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 3336% 6749%
Grand Theft Auto VI 5364% 10790%
FIFA 21 1859% 3804%
Genshin Impact 3783% 7640%
Far Cry 6 5519% 11099%
Hitman 3 4952% 9968%
Watch Dogs Legion 3646% 7366%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 5467% 10996%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1400 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon X1050.

The Radeon X1050 was released over a year more recently than the Quadro FX 1400, and so the Radeon X1050 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro FX 1400.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro FX 1400 and the Radeon X1050 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Quadro FX 1400 has 4.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon X1050, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 1400 is marginally better than the Radeon X1050.

The Quadro FX 1400 has 5 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1050 has 4. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 1400 is 2 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon X1050 is 1. The Quadro FX 1400 having 1 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro FX 1400 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon X1050.

The Quadro FX 1400 requires 70 Watts to run and the Radeon X1050 requires 24 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Quadro FX 1400 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Radeon X1050. The Quadro FX 1400 requires 46 Watts more than the Radeon X1050 to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro FX 1400 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon X1050.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed350 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV41GLRV370
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date09 Aug 2004vs07 Dec 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed300 MHzvs333 MHz
Memory Bus256 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDRvsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth9.6GB/secvs5.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units5vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs110nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs4
Texture Rate-vs1.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units-vs4
Pixel Rate-vs1.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections-vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power70 Wattsvs24 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Wattsvs300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX9.0cvs9
Shader Model3.0vs2.0
Open GL2.0vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.Radeon X1050 is an entry-level GFX based on the 110nm variant of the R300 architecture.
It's based on the RV370 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 400MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 333MHz. Expect a TDP of up to 24 Watt.
Radeon X1050 is not related to the rest of the X1000 Series GPUs due to being based on the R300 architecture and not on the R500. Its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-