Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R5 M330 2GB GeForce 920M 2GB
Cyberpunk 2077 1218% 730%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 1806% 1100%
Genshin Impact 1229% 737%
Serious Sam 4 1806% 1100%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 1629% 989%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1076% 641%
Valorant 24% 22%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 1335% 804%
eFootball PES 2021 571% 322%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1771% 1078%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R5 M330 2GB.

The R5 M330 has a 425 MHz higher core clock speed but 12 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the R5 M330 manages to provide 1.6 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R5 M330 has a 425 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 920M 2GB and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the R5 M330 providing 3.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R5 M330 was released less than a year after the GeForce 920M 2GB, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The Radeon R5 M330 2GB and the GeForce 920M 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The R5 M330 has 1.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the R5 M330 is marginally better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The Radeon R5 M330 2GB has 320 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 920M 2GB has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the R5 M330 is 280 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 86 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 920M 2GB delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R5 M330.

The Radeon R5 M330 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts. The two GPUs require the same amount of wattage to run. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1000 MHzvs575 MHz
Boost Clock1030 MHzvs954 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Sun PROKepler GK208-N16V-GM
OC Potential Fair vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date05 May 2015vs13 Mar 2015
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
5.1
vs green tick
6.4
1600x900
3.6
vs green tick
4.9
1920x1080
2.5
vs green tick
3.3
2560x1440
1.8
vs green tick
2.3
3840x2160
1.3
vs green tick
1.5

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR3
Memory Bandwidth16GB/secvs14.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 128 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units320vs384
Actual Shader Performance13%vs18%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units20vs32
Texture Rate20 GTexel/svs18.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate8 GPixel/svs4.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs25 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHzvsIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R5 M330 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture.

Architecture
The GCN 1.1 revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture adds new important technologies and is largely oriented for energy efficiency. New technologies such as PowerTune and TrueAudio are the biggest additions as well as DirectX 11.2 support.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed Sun PRO which offers 320 Shader Processing Units, 20 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1000MHz and goes up to 1030MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Features
DirectX 12.0 Support (11.2 Hardware Default) and support for Crossfire, Mantle, PowerTune, Eyefinity, ZeroCore, HD3D, App Acceleration and other technologies.

Performance
Because of the very small data transfer rate, Radeon R5 M330 2GB can only be as fast as NVIDIA's GeForce 820M.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Dual Core Processor (Intel Core i3 Quad Core) and 4GB of RAM for a system with Radeon R5 M330 2GB.
Overview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-