Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | Radeon R9 M375 2GB | GeForce 920M 2GB |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 414% | 737% |
| Hitman 3 | 568% | 989% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 370% | 666% |
| Resident Evil 8 | 414% | 737% |
| FIFA 21 | 159% | 322% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 623% | 1078% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 355% | 641% |
| The Medium | 541% | 944% |
| Genshin Impact | 414% | 737% |
| Far Cry 6 | 643% | 1111% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M375 2GB are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.
The R9 M375 has a 425 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the R9 M375 providing 21.6 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The R9 M375 has a 425 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the R9 M375 providing 11.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The R9 M375 was released less than a year after the GeForce 920M 2GB, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
The Radeon R9 M375 2GB and the GeForce 920M 2GB have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The R9 M375 has 20.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the R9 M375 is slightly better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.
The Radeon R9 M375 2GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 920M 2GB has 384. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 M375 is 552 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366. The R9 M375 having 186 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 M375 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 920M 2GB.
The Radeon R9 M375 2GB requires 75 Watts to run and the GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts. The R9 M375 requires 50 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is significant enough that the R9 M375 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce 920M 2GB.
| Core Speed | 1000 MHz |  | vs | 575 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | 1015 MHz | | vs | 954 MHz | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 Venus XTX | Kepler GK208-N16V-GM | |||
| OC Potential | Fair |
|
vs | Poor | |
| Driver Support | Great |
| vs | Good | |
| Release Date | 05 May 2015 | | vs | 13 Mar 2015 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved | | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 8.5
|
|
vs | 6.4
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 6.3
|
|
vs | 4.9
|
|
| 1920x1080 | 4.6
|
|
vs | 3.3
|
|
| 2560x1440 | 3
|
|
vs | 2.3
|
|
| 3840x2160 | 2
|
|
vs | 1.5
|
|
| Memory | 2048 MB | | vs | | 2048 MB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 1100 MHz | | vs | 900 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | 128 Bit | | vs | 64 Bit | |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | | vs | | DDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 35.2GB/sec | | vs | 14.4GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | |
vs | 128 KB | |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 640 | | vs | 384 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 27% | | vs | 18% | |
| Technology | 28nm | | vs | | 28nm |
| Texture Mapping Units | 40 | | vs | 32 | |
| Texture Rate | 40 GTexel/s | | vs | 18.4 GTexel/s | |
| Render Output Units | 16 | | vs | 8 | |
| Pixel Rate | 16 GPixel/s | | vs | 4.6 GPixel/s | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | | vs | | 4096x2160 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 75 Watts | vs | | 25 Watts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 12.0 | | vs | | 12.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5.0 |
| Open GL | 4.4 | vs | | 4.5 | |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | yes | | vs | no | |
| Dedicated | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | Intel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz | vs | | Intel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 8 GB | vs | | 4 GB | |
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | | vs | | 1366x768 |
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview Radeon R9 M375 2GB is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the First Generation of the Graphics Core Next Architecture (GCN). Architecture Radeon R9 M375 2GB Features a GPU Codenamed Venus XTX which is a First Gen GCN GPU and is identical to the Cape GPU used on the Desktop Radeon R7 250X. Venus XTX has 10 Compute Units Unlocked and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. GPU The Central Unit is Clocked at 1000MHz and goes up to 1015MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory: Speed The GPU is equipped with DDR3 and Accesses the Frame Buffer through a 128-bit Memory Interface. The Memory Clock Operates at 1100MHz. Memory: Frame Buffer The GPU can fill up a Memory Pool of up to 2GB. This is Adequate and a Good Match for the GPU's Shader Capabilities. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 75W, it is suited for large laptops. Performance Performance is Comparable to the Desktop Radeon R7 250. System Suggestions Radeon R9 M375 4GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 1366x768. We recommend a Strong Processor and 8GB of RAM for Optimal Performance. | Overview GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture. Architecture This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature. Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops. Performance GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance. System Suggestions We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||