Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 295X2 XFX Hydra 8GB Edition Radeon HD 7950 3-way Crossfire
Red Dead Redemption 2 22% 10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7% 24%
Doom Eternal 33% 23%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 52% 45%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22% 10%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 7% 24%
FIFA 20 58% 52%
Grand Theft Auto VI 19% 37%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 7% 24%
Need For Speed Heat 22% 10%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 295X2 XFX Hydra 8GB Edition are very slightly better than the AMD Radeon HD 7950 3-way Crossfire.

The R9 295X2 has a 218 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 7950. This results in the R9 295X2 providing 89.5 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The R9 295X2 has a 218 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Render Output Units than the HD 7950. This results in the R9 295X2 providing 53.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 295X2 was released over a year more recently than the HD 7950, and so the R9 295X2 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 7950.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The HD 7950 has 1024 MB more video memory than the R9 295X2, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the HD 7950 also has superior memory performance overall.

The HD 7950 has 80 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 295X2, which means that the memory performance of the HD 7950 is much better than the R9 295X2.

The Radeon R9 295X2 XFX Hydra 8GB Edition has 5632 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 7950 3-way Crossfire has 5376. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 295X2 is 4873 and the actual shader performance of the HD 7950 is 3656. The R9 295X2 having 1217 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the R9 295X2 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 7950.

The Radeon R9 295X2 XFX Hydra 8GB Edition requires 500 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 7950 3-way Crossfire requires 540 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 850 Watts for the R9 295X2. The HD 7950 requires 40 Watts more than the R9 295X2 to run. The difference is significant enough that the HD 7950 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 295X2.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1018 MHzvs800 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Versuvius XTGCN 1.0 Tahiti PRO (x3)
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date29 Apr 2014vs01 Jan 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
10
green tick vs -
1920x1080
10
green tick vs green tick
10
2560x1440
9.3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
7.5
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory8192 MBvs9216 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus1024 Bitvs1152 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth640GB/secvs720GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB vs green tick 2304 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units5632vs5376
Actual Shader Performance100%vs100%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units352vs336
Texture Rate358.3 GTexel/svs268.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units128vs96
Pixel Rate130.3 GPixel/svs76.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs3
HDMI Connections1vs3
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power500 Wattsvs540 Watts
Recommended PSU850 Watts & 62 Amps-

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-4960X 6-Core 3.60GHzvsIntel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM12 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution3840x2160vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 295X2 XFX Hydra 8GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Dual-Graphics Radeon R9 295X2, created by XFX.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit Remains the Same.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System remains the same.

Performance
Without Any Overclock Out of The Box, Radeon R9 295X2 XFX Hydra 8GB Edition is as fast as the reference Radeon R9 295X2.
Radeon HD 7950 3-way Crossfire is a solution of three Radeon HD 7950 put together using AMD'S Crossfire technology.
Check the page of Radeon HD 7950 to know more about its chip.
Crossfire relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, is somewhat superior to a single Radeon HD 7990 performing by itself it might be worse (depending on whether or not the 3D game supports crossfire or in the graphics driver) than a single Radeon HD 7950. Expect this combination to draw up to 540 Watt though the average power consumption should be slightly lower.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body