Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Quadro FX 1000 Radeon X1050
Cyberpunk 2077 7484% 7640%
Hitman 3 9766% 9968%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 6836% 6979%
Resident Evil 8 7484% 7640%
FIFA 21 3726% 3804%
Grand Theft Auto VI 10571% 10790%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 6611% 6749%
Genshin Impact 7484% 7640%
The Medium 9363% 9558%
Far Cry 6 10873% 11099%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 1000 are marginally better than the AMD Radeon X1050.

The Radeon X1050 was released over three years more recently than the Quadro FX 1000, and so the Radeon X1050 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Quadro FX 1000 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Quadro FX 1000 and the Radeon X1050 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Quadro FX 1000 has 4.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon X1050, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 1000 is marginally better than the Radeon X1050.

The Quadro FX 1000 has 2 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon X1050 has 4. The two GPUs are based on different architectures, but deliver an equivalent shader performance. To compare, we must continue to look at the memory bandwidth, Texture and Pixel Rates. In this case, we sadly do not have enough data in this area to complete the comparison.

The Radeon X1050 requires 24 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Quadro FX 1000. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Quadro FX 1000 and a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the Radeon X1050. The two GPUs have been recommended a PSU with the same amount of wattage. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed300 MHzvs400 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureNV30GLRV370
OC Potential - vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date21 Jan 2003vs07 Dec 2006
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed300 MHzvs333 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR2vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth9.6GB/secvs5.3GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2vs4
Actual Shader Performance0%vs0%
Technology-vs110nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs4
Texture Rate-vs1.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units-vs4
Pixel Rate-vs1.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs1
DVI Connections-vs1
HDMI Connections-vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-24 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Wattsvs300 Watts & 18 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX9.0bvs9
Shader Model3.0vs2.0
Open GL2.0vs2.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewThe Quadro line of GPU cards emerged in an effort at market segmentation by NVIDIA. In introducing Quadro, NVIDIA was able to charge a premium for essentially the same graphics hardware in professional markets, and direct resources to properly serve the needs of those markets. To differentiate their offerings, NVIDIA used driver software and firmware to enable features vital to segments of the workstation market; e.g., high performance anti-aliased lines and two-sided lighting were reserved for the Quadro product. In addition, improved support through a certified driver program was put in place. These features were of little value in the gaming markets that NVIDIA's products already sold to, but prevented high end customers from using the less expensive products. This practice continues even today although some products use higher capacity faster memory.Radeon X1050 is an entry-level GFX based on the 110nm variant of the R300 architecture.
It's based on the RV370 Core and offers 4 Pixel Shaders, 4 TMUs and 4 ROPs, on a 64-bit of standard DDR2. The central unit runs at 400MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 333MHz. Expect a TDP of up to 24 Watt.
Radeon X1050 is not related to the rest of the X1000 Series GPUs due to being based on the R300 architecture and not on the R500. Its performance is relatively limited - even for DirectX 9 based games. As it's not based on a Shader-Unified architecture, both DirectX 10 & 11 games aren't supported.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-