Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC Low Profile 2GB Edition Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 206% 220%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 180% 192%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 171% 183%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 171% 183%
FIFA 21 54% 61%
Immortals: Fenyx Rising 149% 160%
Genshin Impact 206% 220%
Grand Theft Auto VI 331% 350%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 339% 358%
Watch Dogs Legion 195% 208%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC Low Profile 2GB Edition are marginally better than the AMD Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 28 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 260X, but the R7 260X has 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the R7 260X exhibits a 23.8 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 28 MHz higher core clock speed than the R7 260X and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 750 providing 0.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 was released less than a year after the R7 260X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GTX 750 has 1024 MB more video memory than the R7 260X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the R7 260X has superior memory performance.

The R7 260X has 15.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the R7 260X is slightly better than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC Low Profile 2GB Edition has 512 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition has 896. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 786 and the actual shader performance of the R7 260X is 784. The GTX 750 having 2 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the R7 260X performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC Low Profile 2GB Edition requires 55 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition requires 105 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the R7 260X. The R7 260X requires 50 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is significant enough that the R7 260X may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1058 MHzvs1030 MHz
Boost Clock1137 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-300-A2GCN 1.1 Bonaire XT
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date22 Jul 2014vs08 Oct 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
9.9
1600x900
7.9
green tick vs
7.7
1920x1080
6
green tick vs
5.9
2560x1440
4.3
green tick vs
4.2
3840x2160
2.6
green tick vs
2.5

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1253 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80.2GB/secvs96GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units512vs896
Actual Shader Performance38%vs38%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs56
Texture Rate33.9 GTexel/svs57.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate16.9 GPixel/svs16.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections2vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs1
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power55 Wattsvs105 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 29 Ampsvs500 Watts & 33 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 750 Gigabyte OC Low Profile 2GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Fast-Middle-Class GeForce GTX 750, created by Gigabyte.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit now runs at 1059MHz, instead of 1028MHz and goes up to 1137MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock remains the same while the Frame Buffer was doubled to 2GB: a gimmick which doesn't yield any performance boost and can be considered market to lure consumers into paying more for the same product.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System has been replaced by Gigabyte's Low Profile Cooling System.

Performance
Benchmarks indicate a 4% performance over the reference GeForce GTX 750.
Overview
Radeon R7 260X v2 PowerColor OC 1GB Edition is a Special Edition of AMD's Fast-Middle-Class Radeon R7 260X v2, created by PowerColor.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit has been increased from 1000MHz to 1030MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
None.

Frame Buffer
Untouched.

Cooling Solution
Untouched.

Performance
Benchmarks Indicate a 1% Performance Boost over the Reference Radeon R7 260X v2.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-