Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 650 Ti Asus PH 1GB Edition FirePro S9150
Hitman 3 374% 111%
Cyberpunk 2077 265% 62%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 233% 48%
Resident Evil 8 265% 62%
FIFA 21 84% 18%
Grand Theft Auto VI 413% 128%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 223% 44%
Genshin Impact 265% 62%
Far Cry 6 427% 135%
The Medium 355% 103%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD FirePro S9150 are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Asus PH 1GB Edition.

The GTX 650 Ti has a 28 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9150, but the FirePro S9150 has 112 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 650 Ti. As a result, the FirePro S9150 exhibits a 99 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 650 Ti. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 650 Ti has a 28 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9150, but the FirePro S9150 has 48 more Render Output Units than the GTX 650 Ti. As a result, the FirePro S9150 exhibits a 42.8 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 650 Ti. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The FirePro S9150 was released less than a year after the GTX 650 Ti, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The FirePro S9150 has 15360 MB more video memory than the GTX 650 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9150 also has superior memory performance overall.

The FirePro S9150 has 233.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 650 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9150 is massively better than the GTX 650 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti Asus PH 1GB Edition has 768 Shader Processing Units and the FirePro S9150 has 2816. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 650 Ti is 713 and the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9150 is 2534. The FirePro S9150 having 1821 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the FirePro S9150 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 650 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti Asus PH 1GB Edition requires 110 Watts to run and the FirePro S9150 requires 235 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 650 Ti. The FirePro S9150 requires 125 Watts more than the GTX 650 Ti to run. The difference is significant enough that the FirePro S9150 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 650 Ti.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed928 MHzvs900 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureKepler GK106-220-A1GCN 2.0 Hawaii XT GL
OC Potential Good vs Good
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date31 Oct 2013vs01 Aug 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs16384 MB
Memory Speed1350 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth86.4GB/secvs320GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs2816
Actual Shader Performance34%vs100%
Texture Mapping Units64vs176
Texture Rate59.4 GTexel/svs158.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs64
Pixel Rate14.8 GPixel/svs57.6 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs0
HDMI Connections1vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power110 Wattsvs235 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 29 Amps-

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.2
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-3450 3.1GHzvsIntel Xeon E7-8890 v2
Recommended RAM8 GBvs16 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs5760x1600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Asus PH 1GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Fast-Middle-Class GeForce GTX 650 Ti, created by Asus.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit runs at the same speed.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System has been replaced by Asus' Dual ball Bearing Fan lasting up to 50% longer than generics, this fan runs smoother with reduced friction, its dust-proof design improving lifespan and cooling efficiency.

Without Overclocking Out of The Box, GeForce GTX 650 Ti Asus PH 1GB Edition is as fast as the reference GeForce GTX 650 Ti.
FirePro S9150 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture.

It's based on the Hawaii XT Core (same used on Radeon R9 290X) and therefore offers 2816 Shader Processing Units, 176 TMUs and 64 ROPs on a 512-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1250MHZ.

Compared to Radeon R9 290X, its central unit is slightly lower and overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon R9 290X because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9150 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 10% and 15% worse than Radeon R9 290X.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants