Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 360 (OEM) GeForce GTX 770
Red Dead Redemption 2 206% 45%
Halo: Reach 3% 54%
Cyberpunk 2077 320% 99%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 206% 45%
Doom Eternal 163% 24%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 320% 99%
Warcraft 3: Reforged 88% 94%
Grand Theft Auto VI 367% 121%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 320% 99%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 89% 11%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 are massively better than the AMD Radeon R9 360 (OEM).

The GeForce GTX 770 has a 46 MHz higher core clock speed and 80 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 360. This results in the GeForce GTX 770 providing 85.9 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce GTX 770 has a 46 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Render Output Units than the R9 360. This results in the GeForce GTX 770 providing 17.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 360 was released over a year more recently than the GeForce GTX 770, and so the R9 360 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce GTX 770.

The Radeon R9 360 (OEM) and the GeForce GTX 770 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GeForce GTX 770 has 120.3 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 360, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 770 is massively better than the R9 360.

The Radeon R9 360 (OEM) has 768 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 770 has 1536. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 360 is 685 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 770 is 1667. The GeForce GTX 770 having 982 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTX 770 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 360.

The Radeon R9 360 (OEM) requires 85 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 770 requires 230 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the R9 360 and a PSU with at least 550 Watts for the GeForce GTX 770. The GeForce GTX 770 requires 145 Watts more than the R9 360 to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 770 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 360.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1000 MHzvs1046 MHz
Boost Clock1050 MHzvs1085 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Tobago PROKepler GK104-425-A2
OC Potential Fair vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date07 May 2015vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
9.9
vs green tick
10
1600x900
7.7
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
5.9
vs green tick
8.6
2560x1440
4.2
vs green tick
6.3
3840x2160
2.5
vs green tick
4.6

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1625 MHzvs1752 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth104GB/secvs224.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 512 KB green tick vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units768vs1536
Actual Shader Performance33%vs80%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units48vs128
Texture Rate48 GTexel/svs133.9 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs32
Pixel Rate16 GPixel/svs33.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections1vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections2vs0
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power85 Wattsvs230 Watts
Recommended PSU450 Watts & 33 Ampsvs550 Watts & 37 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4370 3.8GHzvsIntel Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon R9 360 (OEM) is an OEM only, Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture.

Architecture
The GCN 1.1 revision of the Graphics Core Next Architecture adds new important technologies and is largely oriented for energy efficiency. New technologies such as PowerTune and TrueAudio are the biggest additions as well as DirectX 11.2 support.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed Tobago PRO which is essentially a cut-down version of the Bonaire XTX GPU previously used on Radeon R7 260X. It offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The central unit runs at 1000MHz and goes up to 1050MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1625MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 85W, it requires at least a 450W PSU with one available 6-pin connectors.

Performance
Radeon R9 360 (OEM) is a cut-down power optimized Radeon R7 260X. Therefore, its performance stands somewhere between Radeon R7 260X and the weaker Radeon R7 260.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Strong Dual Core Processor (Intel Core i3 Quad Core/AMD FX Quad Core) and 8GB of RAM for a system with Radeon R9 360 (OEM).
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-

Title

Body