Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce GTX 980 EVGA Classified Kingpin ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition | FirePro S9150 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8% | 62% |
Hitman 3 | 19% | 111% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 16% | 48% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 19% | 44% |
FIFA 21 | 54% | 18% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 29% | 128% |
Far Cry 6 | 33% | 135% |
Genshin Impact | 8% | 62% |
Battlefield 6 | 19% | 111% |
Resident Evil 8 | 8% | 62% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 EVGA Classified Kingpin ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition are significantly better than the AMD FirePro S9150.
The GTX 980 has a 404 MHz higher core clock speed but 48 fewer Texture Mapping Units than the FirePro S9150. The lower TMU count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX 980 manages to provide 8.5 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GTX 980 has a 404 MHz higher core clock speed than the FirePro S9150 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 980 providing 25.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GTX 980 was released less than a year after the FirePro S9150, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.
Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.
The FirePro S9150 has 12288 MB more video memory than the GTX 980, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the FirePro S9150 also has superior memory performance overall.
The FirePro S9150 has 95.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 980, which means that the memory performance of the FirePro S9150 is massively better than the GTX 980.
The GeForce GTX 980 EVGA Classified Kingpin ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition has 2048 Shader Processing Units and the FirePro S9150 has 2816. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 980 is 3920 and the actual shader performance of the FirePro S9150 is 2534. The GTX 980 having 1386 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 980 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the FirePro S9150.
The GeForce GTX 980 EVGA Classified Kingpin ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition requires 165 Watts to run and the FirePro S9150 requires 235 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the GTX 980. The FirePro S9150 requires 70 Watts more than the GTX 980 to run. The difference is significant enough that the FirePro S9150 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 980.
Core Speed | 1304 MHz | ![]() | vs | 900 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 1418 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Maxwell GM204-400-A1 | GCN 2.0 Hawaii XT GL | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Great |
![]() | vs | - | |
Release Date | 06 Feb 2015 | ![]() | vs | 01 Aug 2014 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 10
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
2560x1440 | 8.2
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 6.2
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 4096 MB | vs | ![]() | 16384 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1753 MHz | ![]() | vs | 1250 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | vs | ![]() | 512 Bit | |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 224.4GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 320GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 2048 KB | ![]() |
vs | 1024 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | yes | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 2048 | vs | ![]() | 2816 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 100% | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 100% |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 28nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 128 | vs | ![]() | 176 | |
Texture Rate | 166.9 GTexel/s | ![]() | vs | 158.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 64 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 64 |
Pixel Rate | 83.5 GPixel/s | ![]() | vs | 57.6 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 5120x3200 | ![]() | vs | 4096x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | 0 | |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 165 Watts | ![]() | vs | 235 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 37 Amps | - |
DirectX | 12.1 | ![]() | vs | 11.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.2 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Xeon E7-8890 v2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | 16 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 2560x1440 | vs | ![]() | 5760x1600 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce GTX 980 EVGA Classified Kingpin ACX 2.0+ 4GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's high-end GeForce GTX 980 4GB, created by EVGA. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit now runs at 1304MHz, instead of 1127MHz and goes up to 1418MHz, in Turbo Mode. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same. Cooling Solution The new EVGA ACX 2.0+ cooler brings new features to the award winning EVGA ACX 2.0 cooling technology. A Memory MOSFET Cooling Plate (MMCP) reduces MOSFET and Memory temperatures and optimized Straight Heat Pipes (SHP) reduce GPU temperature by an additional 5C. ACX 2.0+ coolers also feature optimized Swept fan blades, double ball bearings and an extreme low power motor, delivering more air flow with less power, unlocking additional power for the GPU. Performance Benchmarks indicate a 13% performance over the reference GeForce GTX 980 4GB. | FirePro S9150 is a server GPU based on the 28nm GCN architecture. It's based on the Hawaii XT Core (same used on Radeon R9 290X) and therefore offers 2816 Shader Processing Units, 176 TMUs and 64 ROPs on a 512-bit interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit is clocked 900MHz while the memory clock operates at 1250MHZ. Compared to Radeon R9 290X, its central unit is slightly lower and overall its gaming performance is lower than Radeon R9 290X because the latter benefits from certified gaming drivers which unlock the GCN's architecture potential while FirePro S9150 is made for professional applications. Therefore, expect its performance to be between 10% and 15% worse than Radeon R9 290X. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | - | - | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |