Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus 2GB Edition Radeon R7 260
Red Dead Redemption 2 161% 224%
Cyberpunk 2077 259% 345%
Doom Eternal 124% 179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 161% 224%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 61% 100%
Halo: Reach 17% 3%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 259% 345%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 259% 345%
Grand Theft Auto VI 299% 395%
Need For Speed Heat 161% 224%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus 2GB Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon R7 260.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 20 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R7 260, but the Radeon R7 260 has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750 Ti. As a result, the Radeon R7 260 exhibits a 7.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750 Ti. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 20 MHz higher core clock speed than the Radeon R7 260 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 750 Ti providing 0.3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 Ti was released less than a year after the Radeon R7 260, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus 2GB Edition and the Radeon R7 260 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon R7 260 has 9.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R7 260 is marginally better than the GTX 750 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus 2GB Edition has 640 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 260 has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 Ti is 937 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 260 is 653. The GTX 750 Ti having 284 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 750 Ti delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon R7 260.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus 2GB Edition requires 60 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260 requires 95 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 300 Watts for the GTX 750 Ti and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 260. The Radeon R7 260 requires 35 Watts more than the GTX 750 Ti to run. The difference is significant enough that the Radeon R7 260 may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750 Ti.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1020 MHzvs1000 MHz
Boost Clock1085 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-400-A2GCN 1.1 Bonaire PRO
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date18 Feb 2014vs17 Dec 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs
green tick vs

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1350 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth86.4GB/secvs96GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs768
Actual Shader Performance45%vs31%
Texture Mapping Units40vs48
Texture Rate40.8 GTexel/svs48 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate16.3 GPixel/svs16 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power60 Wattsvs95 Watts
Recommended PSU300 Watts & 22 Ampsvs450 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GGeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus PH 2GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Fast-Middle-Class GeForce GTX 750 Ti, created by Asus.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit runs at the same speed.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System has been replaced by Asus' Twin optimized fans carefully selected by engineers which drive 2X greater airflow while maintaining 3X quieter performance, combining enhanced cooling with a more pleasant gaming and computing environment.

Without Overclocking Out of The Box, GeForce GTX 750 Ti Asus 2GB Edition is as fast as the reference GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Radeon R7 260 is a fast-middle-class graphics card based on the Second Revision of the GCN architecture. It packs a Core codenamed Bonaire PRO.
The Bonaire PRO is a cut-down version of the Bonaire XT Core used on Radeon HD 7790. It comes with 14 Compute Units and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. This, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. Compared to the Bonaire XT Core, it has support for DirectX 11.2 and has support for AMD's TrueAudio Technology.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 10% slower than Radeon HD 7790 and a little over that when taking Radeon R7 260X as a reference.
The card proves to be very inefficient seeing as it has a higher rated TDP board than Radeon HD 7790 and its release price of $109 makes Radeon HD 7850 a better option.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants