Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce Go 7400 Quadro FX 3700M
Cyberpunk 2077 13680% 823%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 12504% 744%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 12095% 717%
Watch Dogs Legion 13193% 791%
Godfall 22278% 1399%
FIFA 21 6851% 366%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 12095% 717%
Grand Theft Auto VI 19290% 1199%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 19656% 1224%
Genshin Impact 13680% 823%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce Go 7400.

The Quadro FX 3700M was released over a year more recently than the GeForce Go 7400, and so the Quadro FX 3700M is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GeForce Go 7400.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 896 MB more video memory than the GeForce Go 7400, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro FX 3700M also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro FX 3700M has 44 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce Go 7400, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is noticeably better than the GeForce Go 7400.

The GeForce Go 7400 has 40 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro FX 3700M has 128. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce Go 7400 is 18 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 3700M is 70. The Quadro FX 3700M having 52 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro FX 3700M delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce Go 7400.

The Quadro FX 3700M requires 75 Watts to run but there is no entry for the GeForce Go 7400.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed450 MHzvs550 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureG72MG92M
OC Potential - vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Feb 2006vs14 Aug 2008
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory128 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed450 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth7.2GB/secvs51.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units40vs128
Actual Shader Performance1%vs3%
Technology-vs65nm
Texture Mapping Units-vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units-vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2560x1600
VGA Connections-vs-
DVI Connections-vs-
HDMI Connections-vs-
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power-75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX9vs10
Shader Model3.0vs4.0
Open GL2.1vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce Go 7400 is already a middle-class level GPU. It can use up to 128MB of dedicated video memory, plus it features DDR3 memory type. Compared to the previous GeForce Go, it's undoubtedly much better but even so, it can only handle games like F.E.A.R (from 2005) on the lowest settings. The Quadro® FX 3700M high-end mobile workstation graphics solution with its revolutionary unified architecture, delivers 1 GB memory, excellent image quality, and optimized visual computing application performance pushing the limits of a 17" mobile workstation. The reference standard for OpenGL 2.1, DirectX 10, and Shader Model 4.0, Quadro FX 3700M enables next generation applications with new levels of interactivity to meet the demands of CAD engineers, graphics designers, and other technical design professionals.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-