Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 920M 2GB Quadro K4000M
Cyberpunk 2077 737% 409%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 666% 365%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 641% 350%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1078% 616%
FIFA 21 322% 157%
Genshin Impact 737% 409%
Far Cry 6 1111% 636%
Hitman 3 989% 562%
Watch Dogs Legion 707% 391%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 1100% 629%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro K4000M are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The Quadro K4000M has a 26 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Quadro K4000M providing 29.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Quadro K4000M has a 26 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Quadro K4000M providing 14.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the Quadro K4000M, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro K4000M.

The Quadro K4000M has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce 920M 2GB, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro K4000M also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro K4000M has 75.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro K4000M is much better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro K4000M has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro K4000M is 577. The Quadro K4000M having 211 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro K4000M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Quadro K4000M requires 100 Watts. The Quadro K4000M requires 75 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro K4000M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs601 MHz
Boost Clock954 MHzvs-
ArchitectureKepler GK208-N16V-GMKepler GK104
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Good
Release Date13 Mar 2015vs01 Jun 2012
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
4.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
3.3
green tick vs -
2560x1440
2.3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.5
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed900 MHzvs700 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs89.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs960
Actual Shader Performance18%vs28%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs80
Texture Rate18.4 GTexel/svs48.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs32
Pixel Rate4.6 GPixel/svs19.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs100 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Quadro K4000M is a high-end business card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.
Technically the successor to the previous Quadro 4000M, it's based on the Kepler GK104 (despite the SPU count) and offers 960 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 600MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 700MHz.
Quadro K4000M's drivers are certified for professional applications. Therefore, and also because it's underclocked, its performance lies closer to GeForce GTX 675M despite the similarities to GeForce GTX 675MX.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-