Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | GeForce 920M 2GB | Quadro K4000M |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 737% | 409% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 666% | 365% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 641% | 350% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 1078% | 616% |
| FIFA 21 | 322% | 157% |
| Genshin Impact | 737% | 409% |
| Far Cry 6 | 1111% | 636% |
| Hitman 3 | 989% | 562% |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 707% | 391% |
| World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 1100% | 629% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro K4000M are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.
The Quadro K4000M has a 26 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Quadro K4000M providing 29.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The Quadro K4000M has a 26 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Quadro K4000M providing 14.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the Quadro K4000M, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro K4000M.
The Quadro K4000M has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce 920M 2GB, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro K4000M also has superior memory performance overall.
The Quadro K4000M has 75.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro K4000M is much better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.
The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro K4000M has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro K4000M is 577. The Quadro K4000M having 211 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro K4000M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 920M 2GB.
The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Quadro K4000M requires 100 Watts. The Quadro K4000M requires 75 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro K4000M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce 920M 2GB.
| Core Speed | 575 MHz | vs |  | 601 MHz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | 954 MHz | | vs | - | |
| Architecture | Kepler GK208-N16V-GM | Kepler GK104 | |||
| OC Potential | Poor | vs |
| Fair | |
| Driver Support | Good | vs | Good | ||
| Release Date | 13 Mar 2015 | | vs | 01 Jun 2012 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved | | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 6.4
|
|
vs | - | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 4.9
|
|
vs | - | |
| 1920x1080 | 3.3
|
|
vs | - | |
| 2560x1440 | 2.3
|
|
vs | - | |
| 3840x2160 | 1.5
|
|
vs | - | |
| Memory | 2048 MB | vs | | 4096 MB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz | | vs | 700 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | 64 Bit | vs | | 256 Bit | |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | | GDDR5 | |
| Memory Bandwidth | 14.4GB/sec | vs | | 89.6GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | vs | |
512 KB | |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 384 | vs | | 960 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 18% | vs | | 28% | |
| Technology | 28nm | | vs | | 28nm |
| Texture Mapping Units | 32 | vs | | 80 | |
| Texture Rate | 18.4 GTexel/s | vs | | 48.1 GTexel/s | |
| Render Output Units | 8 | vs | | 32 | |
| Pixel Rate | 4.6 GPixel/s | vs | | 19.2 GPixel/s | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | | vs | | 4096x2160 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 25 Watts | | vs | 100 Watts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 12.0 | | vs | | 12.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5.0 |
| Open GL | 4.5 | | vs | | 4.5 |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
| Dedicated | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz | - | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 4 GB | - | |||
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | | - | ||
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture. Architecture This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature. Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops. Performance GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance. System Suggestions We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB. | Quadro K4000M is a high-end business card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture. Technically the successor to the previous Quadro 4000M, it's based on the Kepler GK104 (despite the SPU count) and offers 960 Shader Processing Units, 80 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 600MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 700MHz. Quadro K4000M's drivers are certified for professional applications. Therefore, and also because it's underclocked, its performance lies closer to GeForce GTX 675M despite the similarities to GeForce GTX 675MX. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | - | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||