Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce 920M 2GB | Radeon HD 6950M |
Hitman 3 | 989% | 583% |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 737% | 425% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 666% | 380% |
Resident Evil 8 | 737% | 425% |
FIFA 21 | 322% | 165% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1078% | 639% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 641% | 365% |
Genshin Impact | 737% | 425% |
Far Cry 6 | 1111% | 660% |
The Medium | 944% | 556% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 6950M are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.
The Radeon HD 6950M has a 5 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Radeon HD 6950M providing 9.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The Radeon HD 6950M has a 5 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Radeon HD 6950M providing 14 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over three years more recently than the Radeon HD 6950M, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon HD 6950M when running the latest games.
The GeForce 920M 2GB has 1024 MB more video memory than the Radeon HD 6950M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the Radeon HD 6950M has superior memory performance.
The Radeon HD 6950M has 100.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon HD 6950M is massively better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.
The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 6950M has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 6950M is 278. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 88 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon HD 6950M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The GeForce 920M 2GB transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 6950M. This means that the GeForce 920M 2GB is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 6950M.
The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 6950M requires 50 Watts. The Radeon HD 6950M requires 25 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon HD 6950M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 920M 2GB.
Core Speed | 575 MHz | vs | ![]() | 580 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 954 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Kepler GK208-N16V-GM | Terascale 2 Blackcomb PRO | |||
OC Potential | Poor | vs |
![]() | Good | |
Driver Support | Good |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 13 Mar 2015 | ![]() | vs | 04 Jan 2011 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 6.4
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 4.9
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 3.3
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
2560x1440 | 2.3
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 1.5
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 900 MHz |
Memory Bus | 64 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 14.4GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 115.2GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 128 KB | vs | ![]() |
512 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 384 | vs | ![]() | 960 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 18% | ![]() | vs | 13% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 40nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 48 | |
Texture Rate | 18.4 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 27.8 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | vs | ![]() | 32 | |
Pixel Rate | 4.6 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 18.6 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 25 Watts | ![]() | vs | 50 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | 11.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 4.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz | ![]() | vs | Intel Core i7-2620M 2-Core 2.7GHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | ![]() | vs | 8 GB | |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | vs | ![]() | 1680x1050 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture. Architecture This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature. Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops. Performance GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance. System Suggestions We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB. | Radeon HD 6950M is a high-end GPU based on the 40nm Terrascale 2 architecture. It's based on the Barts Core (therefore related to Radeon HD 6850) and offers 980 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 32 ROPs on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. Its central clock runs at 580MHz and the memory clock operates at 900MHz. Its performance is not exceptionally good due to being heavily underclocked. Most of today's modern games are playable at the highest settings but some exceptions will require lower resolutions or modest presets to be played optimally. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - | - |