Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 920M 2GB Radeon HD 6950M
Hitman 3 989% 583%
Cyberpunk 2077 737% 425%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 666% 380%
Resident Evil 8 737% 425%
FIFA 21 322% 165%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1078% 639%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 641% 365%
Genshin Impact 737% 425%
Far Cry 6 1111% 660%
The Medium 944% 556%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 6950M are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The Radeon HD 6950M has a 5 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Radeon HD 6950M providing 9.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon HD 6950M has a 5 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Radeon HD 6950M providing 14 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over three years more recently than the Radeon HD 6950M, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon HD 6950M when running the latest games.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 1024 MB more video memory than the Radeon HD 6950M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the Radeon HD 6950M has superior memory performance.

The Radeon HD 6950M has 100.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon HD 6950M is massively better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 6950M has 960. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 6950M is 278. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 88 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the Radeon HD 6950M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce 920M 2GB transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Radeon HD 6950M. This means that the GeForce 920M 2GB is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Radeon HD 6950M.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Radeon HD 6950M requires 50 Watts. The Radeon HD 6950M requires 25 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon HD 6950M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs580 MHz
Boost Clock954 MHzvs-
ArchitectureKepler GK208-N16V-GMTerascale 2 Blackcomb PRO
OC Potential Poor vs Good
Driver Support Good vs Poor
Release Date13 Mar 2015vs04 Jan 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
4.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
3.3
green tick vs -
2560x1440
2.3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.5
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed900 MHzvs900 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs115.2GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs960
Actual Shader Performance18%vs13%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs48
Texture Rate18.4 GTexel/svs27.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs32
Pixel Rate4.6 GPixel/svs18.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections0vs2
HDMI Connections0vs1
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHzvsIntel Core i7-2620M 2-Core 2.7GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1680x1050

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Radeon HD 6950M is a high-end GPU based on the 40nm Terrascale 2 architecture.
It's based on the Barts Core (therefore related to Radeon HD 6850) and offers 980 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 32 ROPs on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. Its central clock runs at 580MHz and the memory clock operates at 900MHz.
Its performance is not exceptionally good due to being heavily underclocked.
Most of today's modern games are playable at the highest settings but some exceptions will require lower resolutions or modest presets to be played optimally.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-