Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | GeForce 920M 2GB | GeForce GTX 285M |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 737% | 700% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 666% | 631% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 641% | 608% |
Hitman 3 | 989% | 940% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 1078% | 1025% |
FIFA 21 | 322% | 303% |
Far Cry 6 | 1111% | 1057% |
Genshin Impact | 737% | 700% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 1100% | 1046% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 707% | 671% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 285M are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.
The GeForce GTX 285M has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the GeForce GTX 285M providing 20 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The GeForce GTX 285M has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the GeForce GTX 285M providing 5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over three years more recently than the GeForce GTX 285M, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce GTX 285M when running the latest games.
The GeForce 920M 2GB has 1024 MB more video memory than the GeForce GTX 285M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. However, overall, the GeForce GTX 285M has superior memory performance.
The GeForce GTX 285M has 49.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce GTX 285M is noticeably better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.
The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 285M has 128. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTX 285M is 192. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 174 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GeForce GTX 285M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.
The GeForce 920M 2GB transistor size technology is 37 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce GTX 285M. This means that the GeForce 920M 2GB is expected to run much cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce GTX 285M. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the GeForce 920M 2GB should consume less power than the GeForce GTX 285M.
The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 285M requires 75 Watts. The GeForce GTX 285M requires 50 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is significant enough that the GeForce GTX 285M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce 920M 2GB.
Core Speed | 575 MHz | vs | ![]() | 600 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | 954 MHz | ![]() | vs | - | |
Architecture | Kepler GK208-N16V-GM | Tesla G92-N10E-GTX1-B1 | |||
OC Potential | Poor |
![]() |
vs |
![]() | Poor |
Driver Support | Good |
![]() | vs | Poor | |
Release Date | 13 Mar 2015 | ![]() | vs | 01 Feb 2010 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | 6.4
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 4.9
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
1920x1080 | 3.3
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
2560x1440 | 2.3
|
![]() |
vs | - | |
3840x2160 | 1.5
|
![]() |
vs | - |
Memory | 2048 MB | ![]() | vs | 1024 MB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 900 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1000 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 64 Bit | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit | |
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | ![]() | GDDR3 | |
Memory Bandwidth | 14.4GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 64GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 128 KB | ![]() |
vs | 0 KB | |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 384 | ![]() | vs | 128 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 18% | ![]() | vs | 9% | |
Technology | 28nm | ![]() | vs | 65nm | |
Texture Mapping Units | 32 | vs | ![]() | 64 | |
Texture Rate | 18.4 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 38.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 8 | vs | ![]() | 16 | |
Pixel Rate | 4.6 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 9.6 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | ![]() | vs | 2560x1600 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DVI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 2 | |
HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | ![]() | 1 | |
DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 25 Watts | ![]() | vs | 75 Watts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | - | - |
DirectX | 12.0 | ![]() | vs | 10.0 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | 4.0 | |
Open GL | 4.5 | ![]() | vs | 3.3 | |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | ![]() | yes | |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 4 GB | - | |||
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | ![]() | - |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture. Architecture This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature. Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops. Performance GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance. System Suggestions We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB. | GeForce GTX 285M is a high-end GPU based on the first shader unified architecture. It's based on the G92b Core and therefore offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs on a 256-bit memory interface of standard GDDR3. Its central unit runs at 600MHz and the memory clock operates at 1000MHz. It's therefore related to GeForce 9800 GTX and should perform considerably worse due to its lower central unit but it only ends up being 1-2% slower due to extended driver support. Compared to GeForce GTX 280M it's only marginally faster but should remain within the same power envelope. Most modern demanding games, at the time of its release, such as Crysis were playable at the highest settings using a 720p+ resolution. Therefore, today's modern demanding games should still run fluently at medium settings. However, DirectX 11 games aren't supported. |
---|
Recommended CPU | - | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
GPU Variants | - |