Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 920M 2GB Quadro K3100M
Cyberpunk 2077 737% 348%
Hitman 3 989% 482%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 666% 309%
The Medium 944% 459%
Resident Evil 8 737% 348%
FIFA 21 322% 126%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 641% 296%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1078% 530%
Genshin Impact 737% 348%
Far Cry 6 1111% 548%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia Quadro K3100M are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The Quadro K3100M has a 131 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Quadro K3100M providing 26.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Quadro K3100M has a 131 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Quadro K3100M providing 18 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the Quadro K3100M, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Quadro K3100M.

The Quadro K3100M has 2048 MB more video memory than the GeForce 920M 2GB, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Quadro K3100M also has superior memory performance overall.

The Quadro K3100M has 88 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the Quadro K3100M is much better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Quadro K3100M has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the Quadro K3100M is 542. The Quadro K3100M having 176 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Quadro K3100M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Quadro K3100M requires 75 Watts. The Quadro K3100M requires 50 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is significant enough that the Quadro K3100M may have a slight adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs706 MHz
Boost Clock954 MHzvs-
ArchitectureKepler GK208-N16V-GMKepler GK104
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Good
Release Date13 Mar 2015vs23 Jul 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed900 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs102.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs768
Actual Shader Performance18%vs26%
Texture Mapping Units32vs64
Texture Rate18.4 GTexel/svs45.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs32
Pixel Rate4.6 GPixel/svs22.6 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs75 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Quadro K3100M is a high-end business card based on the 28nm, Kepler architecture.
Technically the successor to the previous Quadro 3000M, it's based on the Kepler GK104 (despite the SPU count) and offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 32 ROPs, on a 256-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. The central unit runs at 706MHz and the memory clock operates at up to 800MHz.
Quadro K3000M's drivers are certified for professional applications only. Its gaming performance is comparable to GeForce GTX 760M.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants