Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 920M 2GB Radeon R7 M260X
Cyberpunk 2077 737% 736%
Hitman 3 989% 987%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 666% 664%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 641% 640%
FIFA 21 322% 322%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1078% 1076%
Far Cry 6 1111% 1109%
Genshin Impact 737% 736%
Battlefield 6 989% 987%
Resident Evil 8 737% 736%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 M260X are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The Radeon R7 M260X has a 140 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 920M 2GB, but the GeForce 920M 2GB has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon R7 M260X. As a result, the GeForce 920M 2GB exhibits a 1.2 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the Radeon R7 M260X. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 M260X has a 140 MHz higher core clock speed than the GeForce 920M 2GB and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon R7 M260X providing 1.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the Radeon R7 M260X, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Radeon R7 M260X.

The GeForce 920M 2GB and the Radeon R7 M260X have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon R7 M260X has 49.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R7 M260X is noticeably better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Both the GeForce 920M 2GB and the Radeon R7 M260X have 384 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and by the Radeon R7 M260X is 233. Knowing that the shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 M260X requires 35 Watts. The Radeon R7 M260X requires 10 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon R7 M260X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs715 MHz
Boost Clock954 MHzvs-
ArchitectureKepler GK208-N16V-GMGCN 1.1 Mars XT
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Great
Release Date13 Mar 2015vs09 Jan 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed900 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs64GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB vs green tick 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs384
Actual Shader Performance18%vs11%
Texture Mapping Units32vs24
Texture Rate18.4 GTexel/svs17.2 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs8
Pixel Rate4.6 GPixel/svs5.7 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs35 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHzvsIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Radeon R7 M260X is a middle-class-level graphics card based on the second revision of the Graphics Core Next architecture.
It offers a core codenamed Marts XT that packs 384 Shader Processing Units, 24 TMUs and 8 ROPs, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 725MHz, the memory clock operates at up to 1000MHz. The regular version should offer 2GB of video memory but expect to see gimmicks of up to 4GB.
Radeon R7 M260X is considerably faster than Radeon R7 M260 due to its extra bandwidth and thus allows gaming at higher resolutions.
This card should be paired with a decent Dual Core Processor at least 8GB of RAM.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants