Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 920M 2GB Radeon R9 M270X
Cyberpunk 2077 737% 414%
Hitman 3 989% 568%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 666% 370%
Resident Evil 8 737% 414%
FIFA 21 322% 159%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1078% 623%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 641% 355%
Genshin Impact 737% 414%
The Medium 944% 541%
Far Cry 6 1111% 643%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R9 M270X are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The Radeon R9 M270X has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Radeon R9 M270X providing 16.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R9 M270X has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the Radeon R9 M270X providing 7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released less than a year after the Radeon R9 M270X, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GeForce 920M 2GB and the Radeon R9 M270X have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The Radeon R9 M270X has 49.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R9 M270X is noticeably better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R9 M270X has 640. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R9 M270X is 496. The Radeon R9 M270X having 130 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon R9 M270X delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Radeon R9 M270X requires 50 Watts. The Radeon R9 M270X requires 25 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Radeon R9 M270X to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs725 MHz
Boost Clock954 MHzvs775 MHz
ArchitectureKepler GK208-N16V-GMGCN 1.1 Venus XT
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date13 Mar 2015vs01 Jun 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
vs green tick
8.2
1600x900
4.9
vs green tick
6.2
1920x1080
3.3
vs green tick
4.6
2560x1440
2.3
vs green tick
3.2
3840x2160
1.5
vs green tick
2.1

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed900 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs64GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB vs green tick 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs640
Actual Shader Performance18%vs24%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs48
Texture Rate18.4 GTexel/svs34.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs16
Pixel Rate4.6 GPixel/svs11.6 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.2
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHzvsIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Radeon R9 M270X is an upcoming high-end mobile graphics Card, based on the 28nm GCN architecture.
Radeon R9 M270X offers a GPU codenamed Venus xT which is at essence a mobile version of the Cape Verde XT GPU. Thus, it offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5.
The central unit runs at 725MHz and goes up to 775MHz, in Turbo Mode, while the memory clock operates at 1000MHz. Expect a rated board TDP of 60W.
Its performance is therefore positioned between Radeon 7750 and Radeon 7770 and thus the card is not suited for 1080p gaming but it needs to be paired with at least 8GB of RAM and a considerably powerful Dual-Core processor.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-