Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 920M 2GB Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
Cyberpunk 2077 737% 653%
Hitman 3 989% 880%
Resident Evil 8 737% 653%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 666% 589%
FIFA 21 322% 280%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1078% 960%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 641% 567%
Genshin Impact 737% 653%
Far Cry 6 1111% 990%
The Medium 944% 840%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 375 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the Pro Graphics. This results in the GeForce 920M 2GB providing 16.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 375 MHz higher core clock speed and 6 more Render Output Units than the Pro Graphics. This results in the GeForce 920M 2GB providing 4.2 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the Pro Graphics, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the Pro Graphics.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 1920 MB more video memory than the Pro Graphics, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GeForce 920M 2GB also has superior memory performance overall.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 1.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Pro Graphics, which means that the memory performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is marginally better than the Pro Graphics.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile has 40. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the Pro Graphics is 208. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 158 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 920M 2GB delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Pro Graphics.

The Pro Graphics transistor size technology is 6 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This means that the Pro Graphics is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce 920M 2GB. While they exhibit similar graphical performance, the Pro Graphics should consume less power than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile requires 47 Watts. The Pro Graphics requires 22 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the Pro Graphics to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs200 MHz
Boost Clock954 MHzvs1300 MHz
ArchitectureKepler GK208-N16V-GMHaswell GT3e
OC Potential Poor vs None
Driver Support Good vs Ok
Release Date13 Mar 2015vs27 Jul 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
4.9
green tick vs
4.5
1920x1080
3.3
vs green tick
3.5
2560x1440
2.3
vs green tick
2.5
3840x2160
1.5
vs green tick
1.6

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs128 MB
Memory Speed900 MHzvs800 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vseDRAM
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs12.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs40
Actual Shader Performance18%vs10%
Technology28nmvs22nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs8
Texture Rate18.4 GTexel/svs1.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs2
Pixel Rate4.6 GPixel/svs0.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs47 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs11.1
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.0
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GBvs4 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1366x768

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Overview
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile are Integrated Graphics in some of Intel's HQ Haswell Processors.

Architecture
The Haswell GT3 Core includes support for DirectX 11.1, OpenCL 1.2 and OpenGL 4.0. Additionally, it also offers better Decoding Performance, when compared to its Predecessors.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GT3e which offers 40 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 2 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Runs at 200MHz and goes up to 1300MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
Unlike the common Integrated Graphics Cards, this one has access to a dedicated frame buffer of 128MB of eDRAM.
The GPU also Shares the System's RAM which varies from laptop to laptop. Typically, the GPU reserves 1GB. Depending on whether or not the system's RAM is Dual-Channeled, it can access either a 64-bit or 128-bit memory interface. The operating memory clock also depends on the at which speed the System's RAM is running and is limited by the highest operating speed that the Processor supports. In this case, it is 800MHz.
It is then obvious the Memory Bandwidth depends on a lot of factors and thus this Graphics Card performance may vary heavily from system to system.

Performance
The Most Powerful Variant Offers Performance on level with a dedicated GeForce GT 745M.
Select the Specific Version you have of this Graphics Card According to your Processor for a more Accurate Rank and experience using our tools.

System Suggestions
We recommend 4GB of RAM for a system with Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-