Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 920M 2GB GeForce GT 750M 2GB GDDR5
Cyberpunk 2077 737% 420%
Hitman 3 989% 576%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 666% 375%
Resident Evil 8 737% 420%
FIFA 21 322% 162%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1078% 631%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 641% 360%
Genshin Impact 737% 420%
The Medium 944% 548%
Far Cry 6 1111% 652%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GT 750M 2GB GDDR5 are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GT 750M has a 366 MHz higher core clock speed and the same number of Texture Mapping Units as the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the GT 750M providing 11.7 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GT 750M has a 366 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the GT 750M providing 10.5 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the GT 750M, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GT 750M.

The GeForce 920M 2GB and the GeForce GT 750M 2GB GDDR5 have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GT 750M has 49.6 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the GT 750M is noticeably better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Both the GeForce 920M 2GB and the GeForce GT 750M 2GB GDDR5 have 384 Shader Processing Units. While the two GPUs have the same number of SPUs, the actual performance delivered by the GT 750M is 406 and by the GeForce 920M 2GB is 406. Knowing that the shader performance of the GT 750M is superior, it is not necessary to examine the GPUs' respective Texture and Pixel Fill Rates.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the GeForce GT 750M 2GB GDDR5 requires 50 Watts. The GT 750M requires 25 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GT 750M to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs941 MHz
Boost Clock954 MHzvs1058 MHz
ArchitectureKepler GK208-N16V-GMKepler GK107-N14P-GT
OC Potential Poor vs Poor
Driver Support Good vs Good
Release Date13 Mar 2015vs09 Jan 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
vs green tick
7.5
1600x900
4.9
vs green tick
5.9
1920x1080
3.3
vs green tick
4.6
2560x1440
2.3
vs green tick
2.9
3840x2160
1.5
vs green tick
1.9

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed900 MHzvs1000 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs64GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB vs green tick 256 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs384
Actual Shader Performance18%vs20%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs32
Texture Rate18.4 GTexel/svs30.1 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs16
Pixel Rate4.6 GPixel/svs15.1 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs50 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHzvsIntel Core i5-3340M 2.7GHz
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
Overview
GeForce GT 750M v4 is a Fast-Middle-Class Mobile Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
The Kepler Architecture was NVIDIA's big step to power efficiency. Each Stream Multiprocessor (SMX) now hosts 192 Shader Processing Units - against the 48 of older Fermi Architecture, and has been redesigned being now clocked at the same speed of the Central Unit. This means they are more energy efficient and will consequently lead to cooler operating temperatures. However, it also means they are weaker. It can be said that one Fermi SMX is as fast as 2 Kepler SMXs.
Additionally, and not available in all GPUs, Kepler also introduced the Boost Clock Feature. The Boost Clock is an even higher Clock Speed activated when in gaming mode and becomes the effective speed of the GPU.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK107-N14P-GT which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 32 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is initially clocked at 941MHz and goes up to 1058MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 1000MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, Kepler Boost, Optimus, CUDA, OpenCL, DirectCompute, 3D Vision Surround, PhysX, Realtime Raytracing and other technologies

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it is suited for average sized laptops.

Performance
GeForce GT 750M v2 is essentially a fast GeForce GTX 660M.
Gaming benchmarks indicate its performance is only slightly below the desktop GeForce GTX 650.

System Suggestions
We recommend a decent processor (Intel Core i5 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 750M v4.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-