Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 920M 2GB GeForce G 205M
Cyberpunk 2077 737% 5607%
Hitman 3 989% 7324%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 666% 5120%
Resident Evil 8 737% 5607%
FIFA 21 322% 2779%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1078% 7930%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 641% 4951%
The Medium 944% 7021%
Genshin Impact 737% 5607%
Far Cry 6 1111% 8158%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce G 205M.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 125 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce G 205M. This results in the GeForce 920M 2GB providing 14.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has a 125 MHz higher core clock speed and 4 more Render Output Units than the GeForce G 205M. This results in the GeForce 920M 2GB providing 2.8 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over three years more recently than the GeForce G 205M, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GeForce G 205M when running the latest games.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 2048 MB video memory, but the GeForce G 205M does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce G 205M has 16. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce G 205M is 18. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 348 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 920M 2GB delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GeForce G 205M.

The GeForce 920M 2GB transistor size technology is 62 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GeForce G 205M. This means that the GeForce 920M 2GB is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GeForce G 205M.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the GeForce G 205M requires 12 Watts. The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 13 Watts more than the GeForce G 205M to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GeForce 920M 2GB to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GeForce G 205M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs450 MHz
Boost Clock954 MHzvs-
ArchitectureKepler GK208-N16V-GMTesla MCP79MX
OC Potential Poor vs Fair
Driver Support Good vs Poor
Release Date13 Mar 2015vs01 Jan 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
4.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
3.3
green tick vs -
2560x1440
2.3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.5
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvsN/A
Memory Speed900 MHzvs400 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsDDR2
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs6.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs16
Actual Shader Performance18%vs1%
Technology28nmvs90nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs8
Texture Rate18.4 GTexel/svs3.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs4
Pixel Rate4.6 GPixel/svs1.8 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs-
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs12 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs10.0
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.5vs3.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsno
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GB-
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768-

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
GeForce G 205M is an integrated GPU with no dedicated memory.
It's based on the G96 Core and therefore offers 16 Shader Processing Units, 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs on either DDR2 or DDR3, depending on the laptop's system RAM. Commonly, it was seen paired with DDR2 on a 64-bit bus width (due to laptop's system RAM not being dual channelled).
It's at heart a renamed GeForce 9400M GS. This GPU was discontinued due to its very limited performance - which was horrible, even compared to G 210M.
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-