Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 920M 2GB GeForce GTX 285M SLI
Hitman 3 989% 548%
Cyberpunk 2077 737% 398%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 666% 355%
Resident Evil 8 737% 398%
FIFA 21 322% 151%
Grand Theft Auto VI 1078% 601%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 641% 341%
Genshin Impact 737% 398%
Far Cry 6 1111% 621%
The Medium 944% 521%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 285M SLI are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GTX 285M has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed and 96 more Texture Mapping Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the GTX 285M providing 58.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 285M has a 25 MHz higher core clock speed and 24 more Render Output Units than the GeForce 920M 2GB. This results in the GTX 285M providing 14.6 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over three years more recently than the GTX 285M, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 285M when running the latest games.

The GeForce 920M 2GB and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.

The GTX 285M has 50.9 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GeForce 920M 2GB, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 285M is much better than the GeForce 920M 2GB.

The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI has 256. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 285M is 154. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 212 better shader performance is not particularly notable, as altogether the GTX 285M performs better when taking into account other relevant data.

The GeForce 920M 2GB transistor size technology is 27 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 285M. This means that the GeForce 920M 2GB is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 285M.

The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 285M SLI requires 150 Watts. The GTX 285M requires 125 Watts more than the GeForce 920M 2GB to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 285M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GeForce 920M 2GB.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed575 MHzvs600 MHz
Boost Clock954 MHzvs-
ArchitectureKepler GK208-N16V-GMTesla G92b (x2)
OC Potential Poor vs None
Driver Support Good vs -
Release Date13 Mar 2015vs01 Feb 2010
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
6.4
green tick vs -
1600x900
4.9
green tick vs -
1920x1080
3.3
green tick vs -
2560x1440
2.3
green tick vs -
3840x2160
1.5
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed900 MHzvs1020 MHz
Memory Bus64 Bitvs256 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR3
Memory Bandwidth14.4GB/secvs65.3GB/sec
L2 Cache 128 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units384vs256
Actual Shader Performance18%vs7%
Technology28nmvs55nm
Texture Mapping Units32vs128
Texture Rate18.4 GTexel/svs76.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units8vs32
Pixel Rate4.6 GPixel/svs19.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections0vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power25 Wattsvs150 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs10
Shader Model5.0vs4.0
Open GL4.5vs2.1
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz-
Recommended RAM4 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture.

Architecture
This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature.
Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency.

GPU
It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops.

Performance
GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB.
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 285M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 285M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, up to X% better than a single GeForce GTX 285M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 285M.
Most demanding games will run at the highest settings with fluent frame rates (30+).
Recommended CPU
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-