Your Graphics Research
Your Graphics Research
| Recommended System Requirements | ||
|---|---|---|
| Game | GeForce 920M 2GB | Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7690M Dual |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 737% | 724% |
| Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 666% | 654% |
| Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 641% | 629% |
| Grand Theft Auto VI | 1078% | 1060% |
| FIFA 21 | 322% | 316% |
| Genshin Impact | 737% | 724% |
| Far Cry 6 | 1111% | 1093% |
| Hitman 3 | 989% | 972% |
| Watch Dogs Legion | 707% | 695% |
| World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 1100% | 1082% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7690M Dual are marginally better than the Nvidia GeForce 920M 2GB.
The HD 6620G has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.
The GeForce 920M 2GB was released over a year more recently than the HD 6620G, and so the GeForce 920M 2GB is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 6620G.
The GeForce 920M 2GB has 2048 MB video memory, but the HD 6620G does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.
The GeForce 920M 2GB has 384 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7690M Dual has 880. However, the actual shader performance of the GeForce 920M 2GB is 366 and the actual shader performance of the HD 6620G is 0. The GeForce 920M 2GB having 366 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce 920M 2GB delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 6620G.
The GeForce 920M 2GB requires 25 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7690M Dual.
| Core Speed | 575 MHz |  | vs | - | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boost Clock | 954 MHz | | vs | - | |
| Architecture | Kepler GK208-N16V-GM | - | |||
| OC Potential | Poor |
|
vs | None | |
| Driver Support | Good |
| vs | - | |
| Release Date | 13 Mar 2015 | | vs | 01 Jun 2012 | |
| GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
| Approved | | | |||
| Comparison | |||||
| 1366x768 | 6.4
|
|
vs | - | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600x900 | 4.9
|
|
vs | - | |
| 1920x1080 | 3.3
|
|
vs | - | |
| 2560x1440 | 2.3
|
|
vs | - | |
| 3840x2160 | 1.5
|
|
vs | - | |
| Memory | 2048 MB | | vs | - | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz | | vs | 800 MHz | |
| Memory Bus | 64 Bit | vs | | 128 Bit | |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | | vs | | DDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 14.4GB/sec | vs | | 25.6GB/sec | |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | |
vs | - | |
| Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
| Memory Performance | 0% | |
vs | |
0% |
| Comparison | |||||
| Shader Processing Units | 384 | vs | | 880 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual Shader Performance | 18% | | vs | - | |
| Technology | 28nm | | vs | - | |
| Texture Mapping Units | 32 | | vs | - | |
| Texture Rate | 18.4 GTexel/s | | vs | - | |
| Render Output Units | 8 | | vs | - | |
| Pixel Rate | 4.6 GPixel/s | | vs | - | |
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 4096x2160 | | vs | 2560x1600 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGA Connections | 0 | vs | | 1 | |
| DVI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| HDMI Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
| DisplayPort Connections | 0 | vs | - | ||
| Comparison | |||||
| Max Power | 25 Watts | - | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended PSU | - | - | |||
| DirectX | 12.0 | | vs | 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shader Model | 5.0 | | vs | | 5.0 |
| Open GL | 4.5 | | vs | 4.1 | |
| Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
| Notebook GPU | yes | yes | |||
| SLI/Crossfire | no | vs | no | ||
| Dedicated | yes | | vs | | yes |
| Comparison | |||||
| Recommended Processor | Intel Core i3-4110M 2.6GHz | - | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended RAM | 4 GB | - | |||
| Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1366x768 | | - | ||
| Performance Value |  | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Review | Overview GeForce 920M 2GB is an Entry-Level Mobile Graphics Card based on the second revision of the Kepler Architecture. Architecture This Graphics Card Equips the Kepler GK208 GPU which is essentially a power optimized version of the GK107 GPU. Whereas it still has a count of 2 Stream Multiprocessors, the bus-width has been cut in half to allow for even a smaller power consumption and consequently a cooler operating temperature. Additionally, the GK208 GPU allows the Central Unit to reach a significant higher frequency, thanks to the Kepler Boost 2.0 Technology. The better the laptop's cooling system, the higher the frequency. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed GK208-N16V-GM which has 2 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 384 Shader Processing Units, 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The Central Unit is Initially clocked at 575MHz and goes up to 954MHz, in Turbo Mode. Memory The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 64-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The Memory Clock Operates at 900MHz. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 25W, it is suited for small laptops. Performance GeForce 920M 2GB is essentially a slightly faster GeForce GT 735M and offers more or less comparable performance. System Suggestions We recommend a Modest Processor and 4GB of RAM for a system with GeForce GT 920M 2GB. | Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7690M Dual is a combination of a Radeon 6620G (integrated graphics) with a Radeon HD 7690M (dedicated). This combination is called Asymmetric CrossFire and can also lead to Micro Stuttering. Since Radeon HD 7690M is a tweaked Radeon HD 6750, this combination will deliver performance similar to Radeon 6755G2 (a combination of a Radeon HD 6620G and a Radeon HD 6750M). | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recommended CPU | - | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible GPU Upgrades | N/A | N/A | |||
| GPU Variants | - | - | |||