Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition GeForce GTX 750 Palit StormX OC 1GB Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 268% 296%
Horizon: Zero Dawn 168% 188%
Hyper Scape 150% 170%
Call of Duty Warzone 168% 188%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 268% 296%
Valorant 74% 72%
Grand Theft Auto VI 309% 341%
Doom Eternal 173% 194%
Death Stranding 183% 205%
Mount and Blade 2: Bannerlord 158% 178%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Palit StormX OC 1GB Edition.

The GTX 750 has a 65 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 750 Ti, but the GTX 750 Ti has 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750. As a result, the GTX 750 Ti exhibits a 6.1 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 has a 65 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 750 Ti and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the GTX 750 providing 1.1 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 Ti was released less than a year after the GTX 750, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GTX 750 Ti has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 750, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 750 Ti also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 750 Ti has 4.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 750 Ti is marginally better than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 750 Palit StormX OC 1GB Edition has 512. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 Ti is 937 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 is 804. The GTX 750 Ti having 133 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 750 Ti delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 750.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition requires 60 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 750 Palit StormX OC 1GB Edition requires 55 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750 Ti and a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750. The GTX 750 Ti requires 5 Watts more than the GTX 750 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the GTX 750 Ti to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the GTX 750.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1020 MHzvs1085 MHz
Boost Clock1085 MHzvs1163 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-400-A2Maxwell GM107-300-A2
OC Potential Good vs Fair
Driver Support Great vs Great
Release Date01 Nov 2014vs18 Feb 2014
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
1600x900
8
green tick vs
7.9
1920x1080
6.4
green tick vs
6.1
2560x1440
4.5
green tick vs
4.3
3840x2160
2.8
green tick vs
2.6

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs1024 MB
Memory Speed1350 MHzvs1275 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth86.4GB/secvs81.6GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs green tick 2048 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs512
Actual Shader Performance45%vs39%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs32
Texture Rate40.8 GTexel/svs34.7 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate16.3 GPixel/svs17.4 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs1
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power60 Wattsvs55 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 29 Ampsvs400 Watts & 20 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i3-4130 3.4GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Fast-Middle-Class GeForce GT 750 Ti, created by MSI.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit runs at the same speed.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer remain the same.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System has been replaced by MSI's Dual Fan Cooling Solution, meaning the Graphics Card is silent under load.

Performance
Without Overclocking Out of The Box, GeForce GTX 750 Ti MSI Low Profile 2GB Edition is as fast as the reference GeForce GT 750 Ti.
GeForce GTX 750 Palit StormX OC 1GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1085MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1163MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was increased to 1275MHz.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 6% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and thus this card is slightly faster than Radeon R7 260X.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-