Recommended System Requirements | ||
---|---|---|
Game | Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition | Radeon HD 6950 Sapphire 1GB Edition |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 232% | 172% |
Assassins Creed: Valhalla | 204% | 149% |
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War | 194% | 141% |
Grand Theft Auto VI | 368% | 283% |
FIFA 21 | 68% | 37% |
Genshin Impact | 232% | 172% |
Far Cry 6 | 381% | 294% |
Hitman 3 | 332% | 254% |
Watch Dogs Legion | 221% | 163% |
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands | 376% | 290% |
In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon HD 6950 Sapphire 1GB Edition are noticeably better than the AMD Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition.
The HD 6950 has a 75 MHz higher core clock speed and 16 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 5850. This results in the HD 6950 providing 18.2 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.
The HD 6950 has a 75 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 5850 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the HD 6950 providing 2.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.
The HD 6950 was released over a year more recently than the HD 5850, and so the HD 6950 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 5850.
The Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition and the Radeon HD 6950 Sapphire 1GB Edition have the same amount of video memory, but are likely to provide slightly different experiences when displaying game textures at high resolutions.
The HD 6950 has 32 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 5850, which means that the memory performance of the HD 6950 is noticeably better than the HD 5850.
The Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition has 1440 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon HD 6950 Sapphire 1GB Edition has 1408. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 5850 is 522 and the actual shader performance of the HD 6950 is 563. The HD 6950 having 41 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the HD 6950 delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 5850.
The Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition requires 151 Watts to run but there is no entry for the Radeon HD 6950 Sapphire 1GB Edition. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 5850 and a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 6950. The two GPUs have been recommended a PSU with the same amount of wattage. As such, there is no need to worry about which will more significantly affect your yearly electricity bills.
Core Speed | 725 MHz | vs | ![]() | 800 MHz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boost Clock | - | vs | - | ||
Architecture | Terascale 2 Cypress PRO | Terascale 3 Cayman Pro | |||
OC Potential | Fair |
![]() |
vs | Fair | |
Driver Support | Poor | vs | Poor | ||
Release Date | 30 Sep 2009 | vs | ![]() | 01 Oct 2011 | |
GPU Link | GD Link | GD Link | |||
Approved | ![]() | ![]() | |||
Comparison |
1366x768 | - | vs | ![]() |
10
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600x900 | 7.4
|
vs | ![]() |
8.2
|
|
1920x1080 | 5.8
|
vs | ![]() |
6.4
|
|
2560x1440 | 3.9
|
vs | ![]() |
4.7
|
|
3840x2160 | - | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
- |
Memory | 1024 MB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1024 MB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory Speed | 1000 MHz | vs | ![]() | 1250 MHz | |
Memory Bus | 256 Bit | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 256 Bit |
Memory Type | GDDR5 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | GDDR5 |
Memory Bandwidth | 128GB/sec | vs | ![]() | 160GB/sec | |
L2 Cache | 512 KB | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
512 KB |
Delta Color Compression | no | vs | no | ||
Memory Performance | 0% | ![]() |
vs | ![]() |
0% |
Comparison |
Shader Processing Units | 1440 | ![]() | vs | 1408 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual Shader Performance | 25% | vs | ![]() | 27% | |
Technology | 40nm | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 40nm |
Texture Mapping Units | 72 | vs | ![]() | 88 | |
Texture Rate | 52.2 GTexel/s | vs | ![]() | 70.4 GTexel/s | |
Render Output Units | 32 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 32 |
Pixel Rate | 23.2 GPixel/s | vs | ![]() | 25.6 GPixel/s | |
Comparison |
Max Digital Resolution (WxH) | 2560x1600 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2560x1600 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGA Connections | 0 | vs | 0 | ||
DVI Connections | 2 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 2 |
HDMI Connections | 1 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1 |
DisplayPort Connections | - | vs | - | ||
Comparison |
Max Power | 151 Watts | - | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended PSU | 500 Watts & 37 Amps | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 500 Watts |
DirectX | 11.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 11.0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shader Model | 5.0 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 5.0 |
Open GL | 4.3 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 4.3 |
Open CL | - | vs | - | ||
Notebook GPU | no | no | |||
SLI/Crossfire | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Dedicated | yes | ![]() | vs | ![]() | yes |
Comparison |
Recommended Processor | Intel Core i7-860 Quad 2.80GHz | vs | Intel Core i7-930 Quad 2.80GHz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommended RAM | 8 GB | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 8 GB |
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution | 1920x1080 | ![]() | vs | ![]() | 1920x1080 |
Performance Value | ![]() |
---|
Mini Review | Overview Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's High-End RRadeon HD 5850, created by MSI. Overclock: Central Unit The Central Unit runs at the same speed. Overclock: Memory Clock The Operating Memory Clock and the Frame Buffer Remain the same. Cooling Solution The Cooling System is now the Twin Frozr II Thermal Design, which is 12? cooler compared to reference cooling. Performance Without any overclocking out of the box, Radeon HD 5850 MSI Twin Frozr II 1GB Edition is as fast as the reference Radeon HD 5850. | Radeon HD 6950 Sapphire 1GB Edition is a special edition of Radeon HD 6950 that features a special cooler using a new dual fan configuration. However, its frame buffer is halved to 1GB and so its performance is worse than the reference card since it's known this GPU benefits from a 2GB frame buffer. Benchmarks indicate its performance is overall 2% worse than the reference card. |
---|
Recommended CPU | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Possible GPU Upgrades | |||||
GPU Variants | - | - |