Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 950M 2GB GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 205% 113%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 179% 95%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 170% 89%
FIFA 21 54% 8%
Grand Theft Auto VI 330% 200%
Far Cry 6 342% 208%
Genshin Impact 205% 113%
Hitman 3 297% 177%
eFootball PES 2021 54% 8%
Watch Dogs Legion 195% 106%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 485M SLI are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M 2GB.

The GTX 950M has a 339 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 485M, but the GTX 485M has 88 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 950M. As a result, the GTX 485M exhibits a 37 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 950M. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 950M has a 339 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 485M, but the GTX 485M has 48 more Render Output Units than the GTX 950M. As a result, the GTX 485M exhibits a 22.2 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 950M. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 950M was released over three years more recently than the GTX 485M, and so the GTX 950M is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 485M when running the latest games.

The GTX 485M has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 950M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 485M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 485M has 112 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 950M, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 485M is massively better than the GTX 950M.

The GeForce GTX 950M 2GB has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 485M SLI has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 950M is 858 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 485M is 883. The GTX 485M having 25 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 485M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 950M.

The GTX 950M transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 485M. This means that the GTX 950M is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 485M.

The GeForce GTX 950M 2GB requires 50 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 485M SLI requires 200 Watts. The GTX 485M requires 150 Watts more than the GTX 950M to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 485M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 950M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed914 MHzvs575 MHz
Boost Clock993 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-N16P-GTFermi GF104-N12E-GTX-A1 (x2)
OC Potential Good vs None
Driver Support Great vs Poor
Release Date12 Mar 2015vs01 Jan 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

green tick vs -
green tick vs -
vs green tick
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1250 MHzvs750 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth80GB/secvs192GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs768
Actual Shader Performance41%vs42%
Texture Mapping Units40vs128
Texture Rate36.6 GTexel/svs73.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs64
Pixel Rate14.6 GPixel/svs36.8 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power50 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4340M 2.9GHzvsIntel Core i7-2630QM 4-Core 2.0GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs1920x1080

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 950M 2GB is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the first variant of the Maxwell architecture.

The first variant of the Maxwell Architecture succeeds the Kepler Architecture. Despite being also manufactured with a 28nm technology, it has an extremely large L2 Cache which allows NVIDIA to produce Graphics Cards with relatively small memory data transfer rates, without causing too much impact on the overall performance. Furthermore, the Shaders have been redesigned and are both more powerful and energy efficient.

It equips a GPU codenamed GM107-N16P-GT which has 5 SM activated and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The central unit runs at 914MHz and goes up to 993MHz, in Turbo Mode.

The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of fast GDDR5, through a 128-bit memory interface. The memory clock operates at 1253MHz. The size of the frame buffer is adequate.

DirectX 12 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for GameStream, G-SYNC, GPU Boost 2.0, GeForce Experience, PhysX and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 50W, it may be equipped in average sized notebooks.

Because GeForce GTX 950M 2GB is just a higher clocked GeForce GTX 850M v2 2GB, its performance is only about 5% faster than its predecessors and so GeForce GTX 860M 2GB is still faster.
Still, it still offers decent gaming at 1920x1080 and most modern games should run fluently at high settings.

System Suggestions
We recommend a strong processor (Intel Core i5 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a notebook with GeForce GTX 950M 2GB.
GeForce GTX 485M SLI is a solution of two GeForce GTX 485M put together using NVIDIA'S SLI technology.
Check the page of GeForce GTX 485M to know more about its chip.
As usual, SLI relies a lot on proper driver support and may suffer from micro-stuttering in lower frame rates (below 30). Benchmarks indicate the performance is overall, up to X% better than a single GeForce GTX 485M performing by itself but at times (depending whether or not the 3D game supports SLI or in the graphics driver) it performed worse than a single GeForce GTX 485M.
Even the most demanding games will run at the highest settings.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants