Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 8850M GeForce GTX 780M SLI
Cyberpunk 2077 528% 20%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 474% 10%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 456% 6%
FIFA 21 217% 39%
Grand Theft Auto VI 783% 69%
Far Cry 6 808% 74%
Genshin Impact 528% 20%
Hitman 3 717% 56%
Watch Dogs Legion 506% 16%
Mafia: Definitive Edition 800% 72%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M SLI are massively better than the AMD Radeon HD 8850M.

The GTX 780M has a 146 MHz higher core clock speed and 216 more Texture Mapping Units than the Radeon HD 8850M. This results in the GTX 780M providing 172.4 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 780M has a 146 MHz higher core clock speed and 48 more Render Output Units than the Radeon HD 8850M. This results in the GTX 780M providing 39.3 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 780M was released less than a year after the Radeon HD 8850M, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

The GTX 780M has 6144 MB more video memory than the Radeon HD 8850M, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 780M also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 780M has 288 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the Radeon HD 8850M, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 780M is massively better than the Radeon HD 8850M.

The Radeon HD 8850M has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 780M SLI has 3072. However, the actual shader performance of the Radeon HD 8850M is 496 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 780M is 2448. The GTX 780M having 1952 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 780M delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Radeon HD 8850M.

The Radeon HD 8850M requires 45 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 780M SLI requires 200 Watts. The GTX 780M requires 155 Watts more than the Radeon HD 8850M to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 780M may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the Radeon HD 8850M.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed625 MHzvs771 MHz
Boost Clock775 MHzvs797 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 Venus PROKepler GK104 (x2)
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date01 Apr 2013vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
7.2
vs green tick
10
1600x900
5.5
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
4.1
vs green tick
9.6
2560x1440
2.6
vs green tick
7.2
3840x2160
1.8
vs green tick
5.4

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs8192 MB
Memory Speed1000 MHzvs1250 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth32GB/secvs320GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB green tick vs 0 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs3072
Actual Shader Performance24%vs100%
Technology28nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs256
Texture Rate25 GTexel/svs197.4 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs64
Pixel Rate10 GPixel/svs49.3 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections0vs0
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power45 Wattsvs200 Watts
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX11.1vs11.1
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.2vs4.3
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUyesyes
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-3360M 2.8GHzvsIntel Core i7-4930MX 4-Core 3.0GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1366x768vs2560x1600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon HD 8850M is a Performance Mobile Graphics Card based on the Second Revision of the GCN Architecture.

Architecture
The GCN 1.1 Release adds support for AMD's TrueAudio Technology which does calculations of audio effects "better" than the CPU and further improves the Powertune Technology.

GPU
It equips a GPU codenamed Venus PRO which has 10 Compute Units activated and thus offers 640 Shader Processing Units, 40 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit Initially Operates at 625MHz and goes up to 775MHz, in Turbo Mode.

Memory
The GPU accesses a 2GB frame buffer of DDR3, through a 128-bit memory interface. The size of the frame buffer is exaggerated and in no way benefits the GPU. The memory clock operates at 1000MHz.

Features
DirectX 11.0 Support (11.0 Hardware Default) and support for Crossfire, PowerTune Technology, Eyefinity, App Acceleration, HD3D, ZeroCore Power and other technologies.

Power Consumption
With a rated board TDP of 45W, it is suited for 17" or larger laptops.

Performance
Gaming benchmarks put its performance somewhat above NVIDIA's GeForce GT 750M.

System Suggestions
We recommend a Decent Processor (Intel Core i5 Mobile) and 8GB of RAM for a system with Radeon HD 8850M.
GeForce GTX 780M SLI is a combination of 2 GeForce GTX 780M put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology.
Together, this combination offers 3072 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 64 ROPs. This, on a 256-bit memory interface, per card, of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 771MHz and goes up to 797MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 1250MHz.
Best case scenario, this combination is expected to offer similar perform to a single desktop GeForce GTX Titan but ultimately, its performance depends on the driver support and on the 3D application.
Therefore, and paired with a powerful processor, all demanding games should be playable at the highest settings. Still, this combination might surpass the 220W barrier of TDP and so only a few laptops will offer it.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
N/A
N/A
GPU Variants
-
-