Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 295 Asus Mars ROG 4GB Edition GeForce GTX Titan Asus Edition
Cyberpunk 2077 105% 20%
Assassins Creed: Valhalla 87% 10%
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War 81% 6%
FIFA 21 3% 39%
Watch Dogs Legion 97% 16%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 81% 6%
World of Warcraft: Shadowlands 193% 72%
Grand Theft Auto VI 188% 69%
Godfall 232% 95%
Genshin Impact 105% 20%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan Asus Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 Asus Mars ROG 4GB Edition.

The GTX Titan has a 189 MHz higher core clock speed and 64 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 295. This results in the GTX Titan providing 83.8 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX Titan has a 189 MHz higher core clock speed but 8 fewer Render Output Units than the GTX 295. The lower ROP count doesn't matter, though, as altogether the GTX Titan manages to provide 3.9 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX Titan was released over three years more recently than the GTX 295, and so the GTX Titan is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the GTX 295 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX Titan has 2048 MB more video memory than the GTX 295, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX Titan also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX Titan has 6.8 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 295, which means that the memory performance of the GTX Titan is marginally better than the GTX 295.

The GeForce GTX 295 Asus Mars ROG 4GB Edition has 480 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX Titan Asus Edition has 2688. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 295 is 715 and the actual shader performance of the GTX Titan is 2355. The GTX Titan having 1640 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX Titan delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 295.

The GTX Titan transistor size technology is 27 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 295. This means that the GTX Titan is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 295.

The GeForce GTX 295 Asus Mars ROG 4GB Edition requires 500 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX Titan Asus Edition requires 250 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the GTX 295 and a PSU with at least 600 Watts for the GTX Titan. The GTX 295 requires 250 Watts more than the GTX Titan to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 295 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX Titan.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed648 MHzvs837 MHz
Boost Clock-vs876 MHz
ArchitectureTesla G200-400-B3 (x2)Kepler GK110-400-A1
OC Potential None vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Good
Release Date17 Jun 2009vs19 Feb 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
9.2
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
7.4
vs green tick
9.6
2560x1440
5.5
vs green tick
7.1
3840x2160
4.1
vs green tick
5.4

GPU Memory

Memory4096 MBvs6144 MB
Memory Speed1100 MHzvs1502 MHz
Memory Bus1024 Bitvs384 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth281.6GB/secvs288.4GB/sec
L2 Cache 0 KB vs green tick 1536 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units480vs2688
Actual Shader Performance34%vs100%
Technology55nmvs28nm
Texture Mapping Units160vs224
Texture Rate103.7 GTexel/svs187.5 GTexel/s
Render Output Units56vs48
Pixel Rate36.3 GPixel/svs40.2 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power500 Wattsvs250 Watts
Recommended PSU750 Watts & 55 Ampsvs600 Watts & 42 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX10.0vs12.0
Shader Model4.0vs5.0
Open GL3.3vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i7-960 Quad 3.2GHzvsIntel Core i7-3770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs2560x1440

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
GeForce GTX 295 Asus Mars ROG 4GB Edition is a special edition of NVIDIA's Dual Graphics GeForce GTX 295, created by Asus.

Overclock: Central Unit
The Central Unit now runs at 648MHz, instead 576MHz.

Overclock: Memory Clock
The Operating Memory Clock runs at 1100MHz while the Frame Buffer is now of 4GB. This is a gimmick and in no way benefits the GPU. Furthermore, the GPU now accesses a 1024-bit bus width.

Cooling Solution
The Cooling System remains the same.

Performance
Benchmarks indicate a 20% performance boost over the reference GeForce GTX 295.
GeForce GTX Titan Asus Edition is a special edition of the high-end GeForce GTX Titan. Check its page to know more about its Core.
This edition has no special features - no overclocking out of the box and no custom cooling system.
Therefore, its performance is exactly like the reference GeForce GTX Titan.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
GPU Variants
-
-