Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon R9 280X Asus Matrix 3GB Edition GeForce GTX 770 SLI
Red Dead Redemption 2 47% 5%
Cyberpunk 2077 101% 31%
Doom Eternal 26% 18%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 10% 41%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47% 5%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 101% 31%
FIFA 20 22% 49%
Grand Theft Auto VI 124% 46%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 101% 31%
Need For Speed Heat 47% 5%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 SLI are significantly better than the AMD Radeon R9 280X Asus Matrix 3GB Edition.

The GTX 770 has a 196 MHz higher core clock speed and 128 more Texture Mapping Units than the R9 280X. This results in the GTX 770 providing 159 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 770 has a 196 MHz higher core clock speed and 32 more Render Output Units than the R9 280X. This results in the GTX 770 providing 39.7 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The R9 280X was released less than a year after the GTX 770, and so they are likely to have similar driver support for optimizing performance when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn't worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings.

The GTX 770 has 1024 MB more video memory than the R9 280X, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 770 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 770 has 160.5 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the R9 280X, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 770 is massively better than the R9 280X.

The Radeon R9 280X Asus Matrix 3GB Edition has 2048 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 770 SLI has 3072. However, the actual shader performance of the R9 280X is 1741 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 770 is 3333. The GTX 770 having 1592 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 770 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the R9 280X.

The Radeon R9 280X Asus Matrix 3GB Edition requires 250 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 770 SLI requires 400 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the R9 280X and a PSU with at least 750 Watts for the GTX 770. The GTX 770 requires 150 Watts more than the R9 280X to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 770 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the R9 280X.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs1046 MHz
Boost Clock1000 MHzvs1085 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 Tahiti XTLKepler GK104-425-A2 (x2)
OC Potential Fair vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Good
Release Date08 Oct 2013vs30 May 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - green tick vs green tick -
green tick vs -
vs green tick
green tick vs -
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory3072 MBvs4096 MB
Memory Speed1500 MHzvs1752 MHz
Memory Bus384 Bitvs512 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth288GB/secvs448.5GB/sec
L2 Cache 768 KB vs green tick 1024 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units2048vs3072
Actual Shader Performance84%vs100%
Texture Mapping Units128vs256
Texture Rate108.8 GTexel/svs267.8 GTexel/s
Render Output Units32vs64
Pixel Rate27.2 GPixel/svs66.9 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs4096x2160
VGA Connections0vs0
DVI Connections2vs4
HDMI Connections1vs2
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power250 Wattsvs400 Watts
Recommended PSU750 Watts & 42 Ampsvs750 Watts

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.4vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-3570K 3.4GHzvsIntel Core i7-4770K 4-Core 3.5GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs12 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1920x1080vs2560x1600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewRadeon R9 280X Asus Matrix 3GB Edition is a special edition of the high-end Radeon R9 280X.

Radeon R9 280X Asus Matrix 3GB Edition does not come overclocked out of the box. Therefore, it offers exactly the same performance the reference AMD Radeon R9 280X does.
GeForce GTX 770 SLI is a combination of 2 GeForce GTX 770 put together using NVIDIA's SLI technology.
Together, this combination offers 3072 Shader Processing Units, 256 TMUs and 64 ROPs. This, on a 256-bit memory interface, per card, of fast GDDR5. While the central unit runs at 1046MHz and goes up to 1085MHz, in Turbo Mode, the memory clock operates at 1752MHz.
Best case scenario, this combination performs better than dual-graphics GeForce GTX 690 but ultimately, its performance depends on the driver support and on the 3D application.
Therefore, and paired with a powerful processor, all demanding games are playable at the highest settings. Still, this combination might surpass the 450W barrier of TDP and so it will require a very powerful PSU.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants