Select any two GPUs for comparison

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game Radeon HD 6770 Asus DirectCU 1GB Edition Radeon R7 260
Halo: Reach 42% 3%
Cyberpunk 2077 513% 345%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 175% 100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 346% 224%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 346% 224%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 513% 345%
Doom Eternal 283% 179%
Grand Theft Auto VI 581% 395%
FIFA 20 138% 73%
Need For Speed Heat 346% 224%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon R7 260 are significantly better than the AMD Radeon HD 6770 Asus DirectCU 1GB Edition.

The Radeon R7 260 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed and 8 more Texture Mapping Units than the HD 6770. This results in the Radeon R7 260 providing 14 GTexel/s better texturing performance. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The Radeon R7 260 has a 150 MHz higher core clock speed than the HD 6770 and the same number of Render Output Units. This results in the Radeon R7 260 providing 2.4 GPixel/s better pixeling performance. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The Radeon R7 260 was released over a year more recently than the HD 6770, and so the Radeon R7 260 is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the HD 6770.

The Radeon R7 260 has 1024 MB more video memory than the HD 6770, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the Radeon R7 260 also has superior memory performance overall.

The Radeon R7 260 has 19.2 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the HD 6770, which means that the memory performance of the Radeon R7 260 is slightly better than the HD 6770.

The Radeon HD 6770 Asus DirectCU 1GB Edition has 800 Shader Processing Units and the Radeon R7 260 has 768. However, the actual shader performance of the HD 6770 is 340 and the actual shader performance of the Radeon R7 260 is 653. The Radeon R7 260 having 313 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Radeon R7 260 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the HD 6770.

The Radeon R7 260 transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the HD 6770. This means that the Radeon R7 260 is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the HD 6770.

The Radeon HD 6770 Asus DirectCU 1GB Edition requires 108 Watts to run and the Radeon R7 260 requires 95 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 500 Watts for the HD 6770 and a PSU with at least 450 Watts for the Radeon R7 260. The HD 6770 requires 13 Watts more than the Radeon R7 260 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the HD 6770 to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Radeon R7 260.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed850 MHzvs1000 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
ArchitectureTerascale 2 Juniper XTGCN 1.1 Bonaire PRO
OC Potential Fair vs Fair
Driver Support Poor vs Great
Release Date21 Jan 2011vs17 Dec 2013
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link

Resolution Performance

1366x768 - vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick
vs green tick
3840x2160 - vs green tick

GPU Memory

Memory1024 MBvs2048 MB
Memory Speed1200 MHzvs1500 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth76.8GB/secvs96GB/sec
L2 Cache 256 KB vs green tick 512 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units800vs768
Actual Shader Performance16%vs31%
Texture Mapping Units40vs48
Texture Rate34 GTexel/svs48 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs16
Pixel Rate13.6 GPixel/svs16 GPixel/s

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs4096x2160
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections1vs1
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power108 Wattsvs95 Watts
Recommended PSU500 Watts & 33 Ampsvs450 Watts & 30 Amps

GPU Features

Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.3vs4.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i3-2100 3.1GHzvsIntel Core i5-3450 3.1GHz
Recommended RAM6 GBvs8 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs1600x900

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewOverview
Radeon HD 6770 Asus DirectCU 1GB Edition is a special edition of AMD's fast-middle-class Radeon HD 6770. It is a reference card as it features a new Cooling Solution but no overclocking out of the box. Read below to know more.

Overclock Out of The Box
The Central Unit remains clocked at 850MHz and the Memory Clock still operates at 1200MHz.

Cooling Solution
The reference AMD Single-Fan Cooling System has been replaced by Asus's DirectCU Cooling Solution. This means the card runs cooler under load.

Power Consumption
The Rated Board TDP should remain the same: 108W. We recommend a 500W PSU with at least one available 6-pin connector.

Release Price
Not available.

Radeon HD 6770 Asus DirectCU 1GB Edition offers exactly the same performance the reference card does.
Radeon R7 260 is a fast-middle-class graphics card based on the Second Revision of the GCN architecture. It packs a Core codenamed Bonaire PRO.
The Bonaire PRO is a cut-down version of the Bonaire XT Core used on Radeon HD 7790. It comes with 14 Compute Units and thus offers 768 Shader Processing Units, 48 TMUs and 16 ROPs. This, on a 128-bit memory interface of fast GDDR5. Compared to the Bonaire XT Core, it has support for DirectX 11.2 and has support for AMD's TrueAudio Technology.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is around 10% slower than Radeon HD 7790 and a little over that when taking Radeon R7 260X as a reference.
The card proves to be very inefficient seeing as it has a higher rated TDP board than Radeon HD 7790 and its release price of $109 makes Radeon HD 7850 a better option.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants