Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce 9200 Radeon 9250
Cyberpunk 2077 14748% 13143%
Halo: Reach 3334% 2963%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10708% 9540%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10708% 9540%
Doom Eternal 9193% 8188%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 6567% 5846%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 14748% 13143%
FIFA 20 5658% 5035%
Need For Speed Heat 10708% 9540%
Grand Theft Auto VI 16415% 14630%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the AMD Radeon 9250 are very slightly better than the Nvidia GeForce 9200.

The GeForce 9200 has no core clock speed set, so any comparison between Texture and Pixel Fill Rates is not currently possible.

The GeForce 9200 was released over three years more recently than the Radeon 9250, and so the GeForce 9200 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the Radeon 9250 when running the latest games.

Both GPUs exhibit very poor performance, so rather than upgrading from one to the other you should consider looking at more powerful GPUs. Neither of these will be able to run the latest games in any playable way.

The Radeon 9250 has 128 MB video memory, but the GeForce 9200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

The Radeon 9250 has 4 Shader Processing Units but the GeForce 9200 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed-vs240 MHz
Boost Clock-vs-
Architecture-RV280
OC Potential None vs -
Driver Support - vs -
Release Date02 Jan 2008vs02 Jan 2004
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

GPU Memory

Memory-vs128 MB
Memory Speed-vs200 MHz
Memory Bus-vs128 Bit
Memory Type-vsDDR
Memory Bandwidth-vs3.2GB/sec
L2 Cache - vs -
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units-vs4
Actual Shader Performance-vs0%
Technology80nmvs-
Texture Mapping Units8vs-
Texture Rate-vs-
Render Output Units4vs-
Pixel Rate-vs-
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)2560x1600vs2048x1536
VGA Connections0vs1
DVI Connections2vs1
HDMI Connections0vs0
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power--
Recommended PSU--

GPU Features

DirectX10vs8.1
Shader Model3.0vs1.4
Open GL2.1vs1.4
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfireyesvsno
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended Processor--
Recommended RAM--
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution--

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewIt had previously been thought that NVIDIA had decided to drop the G and NV nomenclature for a D (for Desktop) nomenclature on their processors. Following the D is the generation number and the target market indicator. NVIDIA's official designations for target markets include Mainstream, Performance, and Enthusiast. For example, the D9E indicates a 9th generation Desktop GeForce video card for the Enthusiast market[1]. However, NVIDIA has actually forked their codenames into those of graphics processors, and those of graphics cards. The GPU cores have kept the prefix 'G' and future versions will include the prefix 'GT'; whereas the actual cards are now codenamed as D, generation number and target market. The Radeon R200 is the second generation of Radeon graphics chips from ATI Technologies. The architecture features 3D acceleration based upon Microsoft Direct3D 8.0 and OpenGL 1.3, a major improvement in features and performance compared to the preceding Radeon R100 design. The GPU also includes 2D GUI acceleration, video acceleration, and multiple display outputs. 'R200' refers to the development codename of the initially released GPU of the generation. It is the basis for a variety of other succeeding products.
Recommended CPU
-
-
Possible GPU Upgrades
-
-
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body