Select any two GPUs for comparison
VS

Gaming Performance Comparison

Recommended System Requirements
Game GeForce GTX 750 Ti KFA2 OC 2GB Edition GeForce GTX 590 EVGA Classified Hydro Copper Edition
Red Dead Redemption 2 160% 34%
Cyberpunk 2077 257% 84%
Doom Eternal 123% 15%
Dragon Ball Z Kakarot 60% 17%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 160% 34%
Microsoft Flight Simulator 257% 84%
FIFA 20 38% 29%
Grand Theft Auto VI 297% 105%
Star Wars: Jedi - Fallen Order 257% 84%
Need For Speed Heat 160% 34%

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 590 EVGA Classified Hydro Copper Edition are significantly better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti KFA2 OC 2GB Edition.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 442 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 590, but the GTX 590 has 88 more Texture Mapping Units than the GTX 750 Ti. As a result, the GTX 590 exhibits a 37.7 GTexel/s better Texture Fill Rate than the GTX 750 Ti. This still holds weight but shader performance is generally more relevant, particularly since both of these GPUs support at least DirectX 10.

The GTX 750 Ti has a 442 MHz higher core clock speed than the GTX 590, but the GTX 590 has 80 more Render Output Units than the GTX 750 Ti. As a result, the GTX 590 exhibits a 43.3 GPixel/s better Pixel Fill Rate than the GTX 750 Ti. However, both GPUs support DirectX 9 or above, and pixeling performance is only really relevant when comparing older cards.

The GTX 750 Ti was released over a year more recently than the GTX 590, and so the GTX 750 Ti is likely to have better driver support, meaning it will be more optimized for running the latest games when compared to the GTX 590.

The GTX 590 has 1024 MB more video memory than the GTX 750 Ti, so is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. This is supported by the fact that the GTX 590 also has superior memory performance overall.

The GTX 590 has 245.4 GB/sec greater memory bandwidth than the GTX 750 Ti, which means that the memory performance of the GTX 590 is massively better than the GTX 750 Ti.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti KFA2 OC 2GB Edition has 640 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTX 590 EVGA Classified Hydro Copper Edition has 1024. However, the actual shader performance of the GTX 750 Ti is 994 and the actual shader performance of the GTX 590 is 1290. The GTX 590 having 296 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GTX 590 delivers a massively smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the GTX 750 Ti.

The GTX 750 Ti transistor size technology is 12 nm (nanometers) smaller than the GTX 590. This means that the GTX 750 Ti is expected to run slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the GTX 590.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti KFA2 OC 2GB Edition requires 60 Watts to run and the GeForce GTX 590 EVGA Classified Hydro Copper Edition requires 365 Watts. We would recommend a PSU with at least 400 Watts for the GTX 750 Ti and a PSU with at least 700 Watts for the GTX 590. The GTX 590 requires 305 Watts more than the GTX 750 Ti to run. The difference is significant enough that the GTX 590 may have an adverse affect on your yearly electricity bills in comparison to the GTX 750 Ti.

Game FPS Benchmarks On Ultra

GPU Architecture

Core Speed1072 MHzvs630 MHz
Boost Clock1150 MHzvs-
ArchitectureMaxwell GM107-400-A2Fermi GF110-351-A1
OC Potential Fair vs Poor
Driver Support Great vs Poor
Release Date18 Feb 2014vs24 Mar 2011
GPU LinkGD LinkGD Link
Approved
Comparison

Resolution Performance

1366x768
10
green tick vs -
1600x900
8.2
vs green tick
10
1920x1080
6.4
vs green tick
8.9
2560x1440
4.6
vs green tick
6.6
3840x2160
2.8
green tick vs -

GPU Memory

Memory2048 MBvs3072 MB
Memory Speed1350 MHzvs864 MHz
Memory Bus128 Bitvs768 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5vsGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth86.4GB/secvs331.8GB/sec
L2 Cache 2048 KB green tick vs 1536 KB
Delta Color Compression no vs no
Memory Performance 0% green tick vs green tick 0%
Comparison

GPU Display

Shader Processing Units640vs1024
Actual Shader Performance48%vs62%
Technology28nmvs40nm
Texture Mapping Units40vs128
Texture Rate42.9 GTexel/svs80.6 GTexel/s
Render Output Units16vs96
Pixel Rate17.2 GPixel/svs60.5 GPixel/s
Comparison

GPU Outputs

Max Digital Resolution (WxH)4096x2160vs2560x1600
VGA Connections1vs0
DVI Connections2vs2
HDMI Connections1vs1
DisplayPort Connections-vs-
Comparison

GPU Power Requirements

Max Power60 Wattsvs365 Watts
Recommended PSU400 Watts & 20 Ampsvs700 Watts & 46 Amps

GPU Features

DirectX12.0vs12.0
Shader Model5.0vs5.0
Open GL4.5vs4.5
Open CL-vs-
Notebook GPUnono
SLI/Crossfirenovsyes
Dedicatedyesvsyes
Comparison

GPU Supporting Hardware

Recommended ProcessorIntel Core i5-4430 3.0GHzvsIntel Core i7-2700K 4-Core 3.50GHz
Recommended RAM8 GBvs12 GB
Maximum Recommended Gaming Resolution1600x900vs2560x1600

Gaming Performance Value

Performance Value

GPU Mini Review

Mini ReviewGeForce GTX 750 Ti KFA2 OC 2GB Edition is a special edition of the fast-middle-class GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
This edition comes with a custom cooling cooling solution which by itself will allow a slight performance boost, as GeForce GTX 750 Ti benefits from the GPU Boost 2.0 technology.
Furthermore, it comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that was raised from 1020MHz to 1072MHz, while the Turbo Boost is now of 1150MHz, instead of 1085MHz. The operating memory clock was left untouched.
Further overclocking can be achieved easily, as the GPU has great OC potential.
Benchmarks indicate its performance is only around 3% better than the reference NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and thus Radeon HD 7850 and GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost Edition are still faster.
GeForce GTX 590 EVGA Classified Hydro Copper is a special edition of the dual-graphics solution GeForce GTX 590.
This edition comes overclocked out of the box in the central unit that went from 608MHz to 630MHz and in the operating memory clock, which is now of 864MHz. Furthermore, it features a new cooling system which keeps the card cool under load.
Benchmarks indicate a 5% performance boost over the reference card and so it proves to be faster than GeForce GTX 680.
Recommended CPU
Possible GPU Upgrades
GPU Variants
-
-

Title

Body